Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 95/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Gharavi v. Google LLC
N.D. California · Jan 12, 2026
CA / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel included a non-existent Wisconsin case in a sworn declaration; court found counsel relied on Bloomberg Law and the error was inadvertent and not in bad faith. Outcome: Motion for Sanctions denied. Rodgers' declaration included a non-existent Wisconsin criminal case citation (reported by Bloomberg Law). Court found the error inadvertent, attributable to reliance on Bloomberg, and denied sanctions because conduct was neither reckless nor in bad faith.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel included a non-existent Wisconsin case in a sworn declaration; court found counsel relied on Bloomberg Law and the error was inadvertent and not in bad faith.
- Why it matters now
- Reliance on Bloomberg Law defeats bad-faith findings, but only if the error is isolated and acknowledged.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel included a non-existent Wisconsin case in a sworn declaration; court found counsel relied on Bloomberg Law and the error was inadvertent and not in bad faith. Outcome: Motion for Sanctions denied. Rodgers' declaration included a non-existent Wisconsin criminal case citation (reported by Bloomberg Law). Court found the error inadvertent, attributable to reliance on Bloomberg, and denied sanctions because conduct was neither reckless nor in bad faith.
Operational lesson
Reliance on Bloomberg Law defeats bad-faith findings, but only if the error is isolated and acknowledged.
Record details
CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtN.D. California
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJan 12, 2026
BL
AI toolBloomberg Law
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMotion for Sanctions denied
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
Bloomberg Law is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Motion for Sanctions denied
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel included a non-existent Wisconsin case in a sworn declaration; court found counsel relied on Bloomberg Law and the error was inadvertent and not in bad faith.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Gharavi v. Google LLC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel included a non-existent Wisconsin case in a sworn declaration; court found counsel relied on Bloomberg Law and the error was inadvertent and not in bad faith. Outcome: Motion for Sanctions denied. Rodgers' declaration included a non-existent Wisconsin criminal case citation (reported by Bloomberg Law). Court found the error inadvertent, attributable to reliance on Bloomberg, and denied sanctions because conduct was neither reckless nor in bad faith.
- Why does Gharavi v. Google LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- Reliance on Bloomberg Law defeats bad-faith findings, but only if the error is isolated and acknowledged.
- What does the public record establish about Gharavi v. Google LLC?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Gharavi v. Google LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.