Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 19, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 18, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesGuerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated)
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Guerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated)

5th Cir. CA · Aug 14, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs quote Ng Fung Ho for the sentence '[N]o deportable alien may be expelled until it has first been determined . . . that he is in fact an alien,' but the court's research could not locate that quote in Ng Fung Ho or any opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Warning in 5th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs quote Ng Fung Ho for the sentence '[N]o deportable alien may be expelled until it has first been determined . . . that he is in fact an alien,' but the court's research could not locate that quote in Ng Fung Ho or any opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Warning in 5th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court5th Cir. CA
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateAug 14, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs quote Ng Fung Ho for the sentence '[N]o deportable alien may be expelled until it has first been determined . . . that he is in fact an alien,' but the court's research could not locate that quote in Ng Fung Ho or any opinion.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs attribute the phrase '[i]t is wrong to deport a United States citizen' to Ng Fung Ho though that phrase does not appear in the opinion.
  3. Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited Doe v. McAleenan as a Fourth Circuit opinion, but the decision is actually a Seventh Circuit opinion and begins on a different page of the Federal Reporter.
  4. False Quotes: Case Law | A quotation the briefs attribute to Afroyim v. Rusk actually originates from a dissent in Perez v. Brownell (Warren, C.J., dissenting).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Guerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated)?
False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs quote Ng Fung Ho for the sentence '[N]o deportable alien may be expelled until it has first been determined . . . that he is in fact an alien,' but the court's research could not locate that quote in Ng Fung Ho or any opinion. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Guerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated) matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Warning in 5th Cir. CA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Guerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated)?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Guerra-Quezada v. United States; Guerra-Vasquez v. United States (consolidated) summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.