HomeCasesKisha Peters v. Banner Health

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kisha Peters v. Banner Health

5th Cir. CA · Jun 4, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesemployment

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Peters filed motions containing AI-generated legal citations and quotations; the court identified these as hallucinated, struck the filings, and warned her to cease using AI to generate citations/quotes. Outcome: Warning; Struck filing.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; Struck filing; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning; Struck filing in 5th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning; Struck filing in 5th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court5th Cir. CA

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateJun 4, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning; Struck filing

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning; Struck filing

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Peters filed motions containing AI-generated legal citations and quotations; the court identified these as hallucinated, struck the filings, and warned her to cease using AI to generate citations/quotes.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kisha Peters v. Banner Health?: Fabricated: Case Law | Peters filed motions containing AI-generated legal citations and quotations; the court identified these as hallucinated, struck the filings, and warned her to cease using AI to generate citations/quotes. Outcome: Warning; Struck filing.
Why does Kisha Peters v. Banner Health matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning; Struck filing in 5th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kisha Peters v. Banner Health?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kisha Peters v. Banner Health summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Reginald Grant v. Amazon.com Services, L.L.C.5th Cir. CA · Jun 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations United States v. Jose Marquez5th Cir. CA · Apr 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations In the Matter of Ikechukwu H. Okorie5th Cir. CA · Apr 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Robbin Y. Miller v. Andrew Stuart5th Cir. CA · Nov 13, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Amanda Adams v. Allen Butler Construction, Inc.CA Texas · May 5, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.10th Cir. CA · Mar 24, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kisha Peters v. Banner Health?

Why does Kisha Peters v. Banner Health matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Kisha Peters v. Banner Health?

Which source supports this Kisha Peters v. Banner Health summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.