Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Gunter v. Contango ORE, Inc., et al.
D. Alaska · Apr 23, 2026
AK / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityother
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Jimerson v. Tetlin Native Corp. as holding that transactions affecting ANCSA lands are invalid absent shareholder consent; the Court found that Jimerson concerned ANCSA stock transfers, not land, and did not support the plaintiff's claim. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in D. Alaska, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Jimerson v. Tetlin Native Corp. as holding that transactions affecting ANCSA lands are invalid absent shareholder consent; the Court found that Jimerson concerned ANCSA stock transfers, not land, and did not support the plaintiff's claim. Outcome: Admonishment.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in D. Alaska, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
AlaskaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Alaska
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateApr 23, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Admonishment
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Jimerson v. Tetlin Native Corp. as holding that transactions affecting ANCSA lands are invalid absent shareholder consent; the Court found that Jimerson concerned ANCSA stock transfers, not land, and did not support the plaintiff's claim.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Akiachak as establishing federal oversight authority over ANCSA land transactions; the Court noted that Akiachak did not establish such a rule and that the D.C. Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Chugach Natives, Inc. v. Doyon, Ltd. to argue the 1996 deed was improper; the Court explained that Chugach concerned whether sand and gravel are part of the surface or subsurface estate and did not support the plaintiff's corporate-voting theory.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Plaintiff relied on a non-existent or 'phantom' ANCSA provision purportedly imposing a shareholder-vote requirement for land transfers; the Court found no such provision in ANCSA and called the argument frivolous.
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Multiple citations in the plaintiff's filings contained incorrect or incomplete identifying information, which the Court noted required it to 'chase down nonexistent authorities' and admonished the plaintiff to verify accuracy of future citations.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Gunter v. Contango ORE, Inc., et al.?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Jimerson v. Tetlin Native Corp. as holding that transactions affecting ANCSA lands are invalid absent shareholder consent; the Court found that Jimerson concerned ANCSA stock transfers, not land, and did not support the plaintiff's claim. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why does Gunter v. Contango ORE, Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in D. Alaska, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Gunter v. Contango ORE, Inc., et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Gunter v. Contango ORE, Inc., et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.