HomeCasesHaddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It remains available for research but is excluded from search indexing until its documented evidence gaps are resolved.

Corpus matter record

Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920

DC Ontario · Jul 17, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondents cited a non-existent rule r.61.09(1)(d) of the Rules of Civil Procedure; court found no such provision and noted s.131(1) CJA governs costs. Outcome: No award of costs as sanctio.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fake citations and contract and records No award of costs as sanctio. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and contract with No award of costs as sanctio in DC Ontario. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and contract with No award of costs as sanctio in DC Ontario. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtDC Ontario

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJul 17, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeNo award of costs as sanctio

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

No award of costs as sanctio

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondents cited a non-existent rule r.61.09(1)(d) of the Rules of Civil Procedure; court found no such provision and noted s.131(1) CJA governs costs.
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondents cited a non-existent case 'Cimpan v. Koliniotis, 2018 ONCA 95'; court searched CanLII/Westlaw/Lexis and found no such case and that 2018 ONCA 95 is actually Turtle Creek Landscape Inc. v. Summit Auto Brokers Inc.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920?: Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondents cited a non-existent rule r.61.09(1)(d) of the Rules of Civil Procedure; court found no such provision and noted s.131(1) CJA governs costs. Outcome: No award of costs as sanctio.
Why does Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920 matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and contract with No award of costs as sanctio in DC Ontario. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Paige Warthen v. Barclays Bank Delaware (Warthen I, II, III)D. Maryland · Jul 13, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group Ltd, et al.N.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)BFG Corporation v. Pierce RE Holdings et al.N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Zhdanovich-Doty v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyN.D. California · Jun 22, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)CIBC Mortgages Inc v Reina FloresManitoba C.A. · Jun 12, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusresearch hold

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 27, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 24, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and contract with No award of costs as sanctio in DC Ontario. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondents cited a non-existent rule r.61.09(1)(d) of the Rules of Civil Procedure; court found no such provision and noted s.131(1) CJA governs costs.

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondents cited a non-existent case 'Cimpan v. Koliniotis, 2018 ONCA 95'; court searched CanLII/Westlaw/Lexis and found no such case and that 2018 ONCA 95 is actually Turtle Creek Landscape Inc. v. Summit Auto Brokers Inc.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920?

Why does Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920 matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects fake citations and contract with No award of costs as sanctio in DC Ontario. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920?

Which source supports this Haddadi et al. v. Soleimani et al., 2026 ONSC 3920 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.