Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It remains available for research but is excluded from search indexing until its documented evidence gaps are resolved.
Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC
D. Utah · Jul 23, 2026
UT / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationstorttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cites Weatherly v. A.O. Smith Corp., 841 F. Supp. 2d 913, 920 (D.S.D. 2012), which the Court could not locate and determined likely to be an AI-generated fabricated opinion. Outcome: Admonishment & Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and tort and records Admonishment & Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and tort with Admonishment & Warning in D. Utah. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cites Weatherly v. A.O. Smith Corp., 841 F. Supp. 2d 913, 920 (D.S.D. 2012), which the Court could not locate and determined likely to be an AI-generated fabricated opinion. Outcome: Admonishment & Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and tort with Admonishment & Warning in D. Utah. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
UtahSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Utah
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJul 23, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment & Warning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Admonishment & Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cites Weatherly v. A.O. Smith Corp., 841 F. Supp. 2d 913, 920 (D.S.D. 2012), which the Court could not locate and determined likely to be an AI-generated fabricated opinion.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Opposition cites Weatherly v. A.O. Smith Corp., 841 F. Supp. 2d 913, 920 (D.S.D. 2012), which the Court could not locate and determined likely to be an AI-generated fabricated opinion. Outcome: Admonishment & Warning.
- Why does Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and tort with Admonishment & Warning in D. Utah. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.