HomeCasesRegan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.

D. Utah · May 4, 2026

UT / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'A.S. v. Norwalk Public Schools (2017)' (purported 6th Cir.) in support of tolling/limitations arguments; court identified it as another fabricated citation. Outcome: Order to Show Cause. Order to Show Cause is here.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Show Cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in D. Utah, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in D. Utah, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

UtahSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Utah

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMay 4, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amount$7,000

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'A.S. v. Norwalk Public Schools (2017)' (purported 6th Cir.) in support of tolling/limitations arguments; court identified it as another fabricated citation.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Amended Complaint misstates the facts and holding of the real case J.M. v. Francis Howell School District; court found the asserted holding inaccurate and relied on this misrepresentation in support of the Sixth Cause.
Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'F.C. v. Capistrano Unified School District' (purported 9th Cir.) to support tolling of IDEA's two-year statute; court identified it as a fabricated, AI-generated citation that undermined the pleading.
Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'A.D. v. Puyallup School District No. 3, 2015' (purported 4th Cir.) to support statute-of-limitations arguments; court found it fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'A.S. v. Norwalk Public Schools (2017)' (purported 6th Cir.) in support of tolling/limitations arguments; court identified it as another fabricated citation. Outcome: Order to Show Cause. Order to Show Cause is here.
Why does Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in D. Utah, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et alD. Utah · Sep 30, 2025same court · fake citations + administrative Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Vett Finlayson; Michelle JohnsonD. Utah · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC, et al.D. Utah · Dec 4, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)D. Utah · Mar 23, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Ryan Lee v. Capital One Bank et al.D. Utah · Feb 24, 2026same court · trial Ross Logan v. LVNV Funding et al.D. Utah · Nov 5, 2025same court · trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Amended Complaint misstates the facts and holding of the real case J.M. v. Francis Howell School District; court found the asserted holding inaccurate and relied on this misrepresentation in support of the Sixth Cause.

Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'F.C. v. Capistrano Unified School District' (purported 9th Cir.) to support tolling of IDEA's two-year statute; court identified it as a fabricated, AI-generated citation that undermined the pleading.

Fabricated: Case Law | Amended Complaint cited a non-existent 'A.D. v. Puyallup School District No. 3, 2015' (purported 4th Cir.) to support statute-of-limitations arguments; court found it fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.?

Why does Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.?

Which source supports this Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.