Heys v. Dobberstein
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CC Michigan · Jun 3, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The pleading cited Berger v. Berger, 504 Mich. 984 (2002), and the court ordered counsel to produce a copy for verification; the order did not expressly find the citation fabricated. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Reprimand. The reprimand was later confirmed in disciplinary proceedings (see here).
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Sanction; Reprimand. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Reprimand in CC Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The pleading cited Berger v. Berger, 504 Mich. 984 (2002), and the court ordered counsel to produce a copy for verification; the order did not expressly find the citation fabricated. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Reprimand. The reprimand was later confirmed in disciplinary proceedings (see here).
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Reprimand in CC Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Monetary Sanction; Reprimand
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The pleading cited Berger v. Berger, 504 Mich. 984 (2002), and the court ordered counsel to produce a copy for verification; the order did not expressly find the citation fabricated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The pleading cited Morrow v. Morrow, 377 Mich. App. 132 (2024), and the court ordered counsel to produce a copy; the order did not expressly validate or reject the citation.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | The pleading cited nine journal articles with generic titles and incomplete bibliographic information; the court ordered counsel to produce copies, but did not expressly find that any article was nonexistent or misquoted.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The pleading cited multiple additional Michigan appellate cases, including Schroeder, Pecoraro, Mason, Eaton, Ramos, Roberts, Porter, Williams, Peterson, Daniels, and Henderson; the court required production of copies but made no express finding regarding their existence or accuracy.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Heys v. Dobberstein?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The pleading cited Berger v. Berger, 504 Mich. 984 (2002), and the court ordered counsel to produce a copy for verification; the order did not expressly find the citation fabricated. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Reprimand. The reprimand was later confirmed in disciplinary proceedings (see here).
- Why does Heys v. Dobberstein matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Sanction; Reprimand in CC Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Heys v. Dobberstein?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Heys v. Dobberstein summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.