HomeCasesIn re Molina

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

In re Molina

E.D. New York (Bankruptcy) · Sep 22, 2025

NY / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsbar referralbankruptcy

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a disciplinary decision that the Court and opposing counsel could not locate; viewed as a potentially fictitious citation. Outcome: Order to sworn accuracy of citations.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to sworn accuracy of citations; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to sworn accuracy of citations in E.D. New York (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to sworn accuracy of citations in E.D. New York (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtE.D. New York (Bankruptcy)

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateSep 22, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeOrder to sworn accuracy of citations

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to sworn accuracy of citations

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a disciplinary decision that the Court and opposing counsel could not locate; viewed as a potentially fictitious citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an E.D.N.Y. opinion that the Court could not locate; treated as a nonexistent citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a California appellate decision the Court could not locate; flagged as potentially fictional.
Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an E.D. Cal. opinion that the Court could not find; treated as a possibly fabricated citation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Molina?: Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a disciplinary decision that the Court and opposing counsel could not locate; viewed as a potentially fictitious citation. Outcome: Order to sworn accuracy of citations.
Why does In re Molina matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to sworn accuracy of citations in E.D. New York (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In re Molina?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In re Molina summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Kevin Krzeminski v. Janine McQuillanSC New York · Jul 6, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Jason Wimberly v. Verizon New York Inc.S.D. New York · Jun 12, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations LiveVideo.AI Corp. v. RedstoneS.D. New York · Jun 9, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + bar referral Owens v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.E.D. New York · Jun 4, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Polanco v. Himalayan Real Estate LLC, et al.E.D. New York · May 27, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtE.D. New York (Bankruptcy)

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateSep 22, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeOrder to sworn accuracy of citations

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a disciplinary decision that the Court and opposing counsel could not locate; viewed as a potentially fictitious citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an E.D.N.Y. opinion that the Court could not locate; treated as a nonexistent citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited a California appellate decision the Court could not locate; flagged as potentially fictional.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited an E.D. Cal. opinion that the Court could not find; treated as a possibly fabricated citation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Molina?

Why does In re Molina matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about In re Molina?

Which source supports this In re Molina summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.