In re Ricardo Andres Romeu
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Texas · Dec 16, 2025
What happened in this matter?
The court denied the relator's petition for a writ of mandamus and issued a formal warning regarding the inclusion of a non-existent case citation in the relator's brief, explicitly cautioning that future filings containing false case law may lead to sanctions.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Relator's brief included a citation to a non-existent case; the court identified it as false and warned of possible future sanctions.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Why this matter is tracked
In this original proceeding for a writ of mandamus, the Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.), denied the relator's petition for failing to demonstrate entitlement to relief. During the review of the relator's brief, the court identified a citation to a non-existent case. The court issued a formal warning to the pro se relator, noting that future filings containing false case law may result in the imposition of sanctions under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.11(a), which allows for penalties against parties or attorneys who file groundless petitions or fail to act in good faith. The court's memorandum opinion serves as an official notice regarding the requirement for accurate legal citations in appellate filings.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Original proceeding for a writ of mandamus in the Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.), resulting in a denied petition and a judicial warning.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Relator's brief included a citation to a non-existent case; the court identified it as false and warned of possible future sanctions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re Ricardo Andres Romeu?
- The court denied the relator's petition for a writ of mandamus and issued a formal warning regarding the inclusion of a non-existent case citation in the relator's brief, explicitly cautioning that future filings containing false case law may lead to sanctions.
- Why does In re Ricardo Andres Romeu matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
- What does the public record establish about In re Ricardo Andres Romeu?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this In re Ricardo Andres Romeu summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.