Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
In re: Tracy Johnson
CA Texas · Oct 30, 2025
TX / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In a mandamus proceeding from the 309th District Court of Harris County, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals denied Tracy Johnson's petition and noted that her brief cited non-existent cases. The court warned that future use of false case law could result in sanctions under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.11.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Citations to non-existent cases.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Why this matter is tracked
In a mandamus proceeding from the 309th District Court of Harris County, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals denied Tracy Johnson's petition and noted that her brief cited non-existent cases. The court warned that future use of false case law could result in sanctions under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.11.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Record details
TexasSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Texas
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit5th Circuit
DateOct 30, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Citations to non-existent cases.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re: Tracy Johnson?
- In a mandamus proceeding from the 309th District Court of Harris County, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals denied Tracy Johnson's petition and noted that her brief cited non-existent cases. The court warned that future use of false case law could result in sanctions under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.11.
- Why does In re: Tracy Johnson matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Texas, with the listed outcome: Warning.
- What does the public record establish about In re: Tracy Johnson?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this In re: Tracy Johnson summary?
- The recorded source is law.justia.com. It is classified as docket or legal-document mirror; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.