Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 11, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 9, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/courts/CA Texas
CTTXState or local
Illustrated court-scope marker · not a courthouse photo
Source-linked corpus view

CA Texas

CA Texas appears in 19 of 2,038 public corpus records (0.9%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records19
Corpus denominator2,038
Source linked100%
Latest trackedAug 18, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA Texas?

AI Vortex currently links 19 source-linked public matters associated with CA Texas. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (17), Misrepresented authority (9) and Fabricated or altered quotations (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (12), Warning or admonishment (6) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities17 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded12 records
Known numeric amountsNone recorded0 known · 0 unquantified
Recorded date rangeOct 30, 2025through Aug 18, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 19 of 19 matching records.

Kourradi v. ChristopherCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 18, 2026
San Antonio Independent School District v. Laura Becerra (as Next Friend of J.C.)CA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 5, 2026
Kevin Dale Higgins v. The State of TexasCA Texas · TX · Unidentified
Jul 31, 2026
In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., ChildrenCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 30, 2026
In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., ChildrenCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 30, 2026
Shaddai Harris v. Iliac, LLCCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 16, 2026
In the Interest of Q.C. and P.C., ChildrenCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 9, 2026
Paris v. ParisCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 25, 2026
Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell SadlerCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 12, 2026
Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff HondaCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 28, 2026
Amanda Adams v. Allen Butler Construction, Inc.CA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 5, 2026
K.C. v. D.R.CA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Apr 30, 2026
Joann Crawford v. Buffalo Creek Properties, LLCCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Apr 23, 2026
Stanford v. LeinartCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Apr 2, 2026
Sidni Campbell v. John Campbell, Jr.CA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jan 22, 2026
Suday v. SudayCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jan 14, 2026
In re Ricardo Andres RomeuCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Dec 16, 2025
Interest of M. O. W.CA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Nov 7, 2025
In re: Tracy JohnsonCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 30, 2025
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.