Intelligence Consulting Enterprise Solutions, Inc.
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
GAO · Aug 11, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Legal Norm | ICES attributed language concerning consideration of similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement to 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e). GAO noted that the quotation omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) actually addresses capabilities, past performance, and experience in offers submitted by joint ventures. Outcome: The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed.. ICES cited 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e) and represented that it required consideration of past performance from similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement. The Army pointed out that the quoted language omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) concerns joint ventures, not individual small-business teaming arrangements. The Army characterized the quotation as possibly AI-hallucinated. GAO reproduced the correct provision, reminded the protester that AI-generated citations must be checked, and proceeded to address the related argument under the correct provision, 13 C.F.R. § 125.2(g).
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and trial and records The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and trial with The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed. in GAO. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Legal Norm | ICES attributed language concerning consideration of similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement to 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e). GAO noted that the quotation omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) actually addresses capabilities, past performance, and experience in offers submitted by joint ventures. Outcome: The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed.. ICES cited 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e) and represented that it required consideration of past performance from similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement. The Army pointed out that the quoted language omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) concerns joint ventures, not individual small-business teaming arrangements. The Army characterized the quotation as possibly AI-hallucinated. GAO reproduced the correct provision, reminded the protester that AI-generated citations must be checked, and proceeded to address the related argument under the correct provision, 13 C.F.R. § 125.2(g).
This matter connects fabricated quotes and trial with The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed. in GAO. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | ICES attributed language concerning consideration of similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement to 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e). GAO noted that the quotation omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) actually addresses capabilities, past performance, and experience in offers submitted by joint ventures.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Intelligence Consulting Enterprise Solutions, Inc.?
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | ICES attributed language concerning consideration of similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement to 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e). GAO noted that the quotation omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) actually addresses capabilities, past performance, and experience in offers submitted by joint ventures. Outcome: The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed.. ICES cited 13 C.F.R. § 125.8(e) and represented that it required consideration of past performance from similarly situated subcontractors in a small-business teaming arrangement. The Army pointed out that the quoted language omitted material text and that § 125.8(e) concerns joint ventures, not individual small-business teaming arrangements. The Army characterized the quotation as possibly AI-hallucinated. GAO reproduced the correct provision, reminded the protester that AI-generated citations must be checked, and proceeded to address the related argument under the correct provision, 13 C.F.R. § 125.2(g).
- Why does Intelligence Consulting Enterprise Solutions, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and trial with The protest was sustained in part and denied in part; the alleged AI-generated quotation was corrected, and no separate sanction was imposed. in GAO. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Intelligence Consulting Enterprise Solutions, Inc.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Intelligence Consulting Enterprise Solutions, Inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.