Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 27, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Source-linked corpus view

Tennessee

Tennessee appears in 18 of 2,223 public corpus records (0.8%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records18
Corpus denominator2,223
Source linked100%
Latest trackedAug 14, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Tennessee?

AI Vortex currently links 18 source-linked public matters associated with Tennessee. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (18), Fabricated or altered quotations (9) and Misrepresented authority (5). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (8), Warning or admonishment (7) and Monetary sanction (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities18 records
Leading recorded responseNo adjudicated consequence recorded8 records
Known USD amounts$47,2632 known · 0 unquantified
Recorded date rangeJul 29, 2025through Aug 14, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 18 of 18 matching records.

Davis v. Gopal, Didyuk, and Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsShelby County CC Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Aug 14, 2026
In re BFI Waste Sys. of Tenn.M.D. Tennessee · TN · Unidentified
Aug 6, 2026
Harding Place Multifamily Partners v. Samuel RobinsonCA Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Jul 29, 2026
Merritt v. MooreCA Tennessee · TN · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 21, 2026
Bailey v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.W.D. Tennessee · TN · Unidentified
Jun 8, 2026
Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al.W.D. Tennessee · TN · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jun 2, 2026
Simmons v. Shahidul IslamCA Tennessee · TN · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 21, 2026
Pate v. CMG Mortgage, Inc., et al.E.D. Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Apr 28, 2026
Edward Reynolds v. Progressive Technologies, Inc.W.D. Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Mar 30, 2026
Randel Edward Page, Jr. v. Apperson CrumpW.D. Tennessee · TN · Unidentified
Mar 30, 2026
Moses v. StateCA Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Feb 25, 2026
Kenneth Merritt v. American Home ShieldCA Tennessee · TN · AI (implied, unspecified)
Feb 4, 2026
Femhealth USA Carafem v. Rickey Nelson WilliamsM.D. Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Jan 23, 2026
Shields v. First FinancialTennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Nov 21, 2025
Jeremie Montgomery v. AFL-CIOM.D. Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Nov 14, 2025
Jamison Warfield v. W.N. Morehouse Truck Line, Inc.E.D. Tennessee · TN · No tool named in source
Nov 6, 2025
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. v. Dennis Michael PhilipsonW.D. Tennessee · TN · Unidentified
Sep 11, 2025
Axis Dynamics, Inc. v. Knox County, TennesseeE.D. Tennessee · TN · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 29, 2025
Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.