JLM v. Children’s Aid Society of the City of Guelph and the County of Wellington
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Courtready; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Child and Family Services Review Board · Sep 10, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | The Applicant’s submissions allegedly contained incorrect citations to sections of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017. The Board noted the problem but did not identify or analyze any specific citation.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and misrepresented authority and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Child and Family Services Review Board. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | The Applicant’s submissions allegedly contained incorrect citations to sections of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017. The Board noted the problem but did not identify or analyze any specific citation.
This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Child and Family Services Review Board. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | The Applicant’s submissions allegedly contained incorrect citations to sections of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017. The Board noted the problem but did not identify or analyze any specific citation.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in JLM v. Children’s Aid Society of the City of Guelph and the County of Wellington?
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | The Applicant’s submissions allegedly contained incorrect citations to sections of the Child, Youth and Family Services Act, 2017. The Board noted the problem but did not identify or analyze any specific citation.
- Why does JLM v. Children’s Aid Society of the City of Guelph and the County of Wellington matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Child and Family Services Review Board. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about JLM v. Children’s Aid Society of the City of Guelph and the County of Wellington?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this JLM v. Children’s Aid Society of the City of Guelph and the County of Wellington summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
This record comes from Canada. See Fictitious citations in Canadian courts for counts across the corpus and the court guidance on AI.
This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.