AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 5, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesJohn A. Griffiths
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 66/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

John A. Griffiths

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0). What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

Arizona State Bar · Mar 13, 2026

AZ / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritytrialMonetaryBar Referral
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Eve.legal supplied a citation for a case that does not exist; defense counsel flagged it as an AI-generated fabricated case. Outcome: Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200..

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200. in Arizona State Bar. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Eve.legal supplied a citation for a case that does not exist; defense counsel flagged it as an AI-generated fabricated case. Outcome: Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200..

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200. in Arizona State Bar. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore AZOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtArizona State Bar
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateMar 13, 2026
First seenAug 7, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolEve.legal
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeReprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200.
Known amount$1,200
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Eve.legal is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Eve.legal supplied a citation for a case that does not exist; defense counsel flagged it as an AI-generated fabricated case.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Eve.legal provided a citation and a quotation attributed to a real case; the cited case did not support the proposition nor contain the quoted language.

Questions this record answers

What happened in John A. Griffiths?
Fabricated: Case Law | Eve.legal supplied a citation for a case that does not exist; defense counsel flagged it as an AI-generated fabricated case. Outcome: Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200..
Why does John A. Griffiths matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Reprimand and order to pay State Bar costs and expenses of $1,200. in Arizona State Bar. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about John A. Griffiths?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. No underlying public source link is currently recorded. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this John A. Griffiths summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases Database. It is classified as source link missing; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Offen Petroleum v. L&J ExpressD. Arizona · Feb 4, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesMavy v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. Arizona · Jan 13, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesJodell Dodge v. FirstService Residential Arizona LLCD. Arizona · Dec 8, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesRobert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of RegentsD. Arizona · Oct 29, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesThompson v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. Arizona · Sep 5, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesMoffett v. Ally Capital CorporationD. Arizona · Sep 21, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.