HomeCasesRobert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents

D. Arizona · Oct 29, 2025

AZ / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycivil rights

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion. Outcome: Show Cause Order.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pearson v. Callahan while characterizing it as supporting the opposite proposition; Court explains Pearson actually endorses early resolution of qualified-immunity questions. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Ninth Circuit opinion to support the proposition that qualified-immunity dismissals are premature; Court and defendants could not locate the case and characterized it as hallucinatory.
Why it matters now: Misrepresenting precedent is treated like fabrication; verify each holding, not just the citation string.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Misrepresenting precedent is treated like fabrication; verify each holding, not just the citation string.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateOct 29, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeShow Cause Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Show Cause Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pearson v. Callahan while characterizing it as supporting the opposite proposition; Court explains Pearson actually endorses early resolution of qualified-immunity questions.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Ninth Circuit opinion to support the proposition that qualified-immunity dismissals are premature; Court and defendants could not locate the case and characterized it as hallucinatory.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion. Outcome: Show Cause Order.
Why does Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents matter for legal AI risk?: Misrepresenting precedent is treated like fabrication; verify each holding, not just the citation string.
What does the public record establish about Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Offen Petroleum v. L&J ExpressD. Arizona · Feb 4, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Mavy v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. Arizona · Jan 13, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Wireless Investors LLC v. Semtech Incorporated, et al.D. Arizona · Dec 18, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. Arizona · Sep 5, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Jodell Dodge v. FirstService Residential Arizona LLCD. Arizona · Dec 8, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Arnaoudoff v. Tivity Health IncorporatedD. Arizona · Mar 11, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Misrepresenting precedent is treated like fabrication; verify each holding, not just the citation string.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateOct 29, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeShow Cause Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted language attributed to Johnson v. City of Shelby that does not appear in that decision; Court notes the quoted text is not in the cited opinion.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pearson v. Callahan while characterizing it as supporting the opposite proposition; Court explains Pearson actually endorses early resolution of qualified-immunity questions.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent Ninth Circuit opinion to support the proposition that qualified-immunity dismissals are premature; Court and defendants could not locate the case and characterized it as hallucinatory.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents?

Why does Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents matter for legal AI risk?

Misrepresenting precedent is treated like fabrication; verify each holding, not just the citation string.

What does the public record establish about Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents?

Which source supports this Robert Cole Stemkowski Goldman v. Arizona Board of Regents summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.