HomeCasesKapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.

Ontario SCJ · Mar 10, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: highfabricated quotesbar referralcontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 44 of the Reply Factum purports to quote BH Frontier Solutions Inc. v. 11054660 Canada Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Every block quote in a factum must be pulled from the primary source — invented quotations trigger Law Society referrals.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Every block quote in a factum must be pulled from the primary source — invented quotations trigger Law Society referrals.

Record details

CourtOntario SCJ

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateMar 10, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 44 of the Reply Factum purports to quote BH Frontier Solutions Inc. v. 11054660 Canada Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 52 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up (and misattributes authorship).
False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 58 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Pita Royale Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 79 of the Reply Factum again purports to quote Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up (and misattributes the author).
False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 36 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 41 of the Reply Factum purports to quote FNF Enterprises Inc. v. Wag and Train Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 43 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Pita Royale Inc. v. Buckingham Properties Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 44 of the Reply Factum purports to quote BH Frontier Solutions Inc. v. 11054660 Canada Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Why does Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: Every block quote in a factum must be pulled from the primary source — invented quotations trigger Law Society referrals.
What does the public record establish about Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.Ontario SCJ · Feb 4, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + contract Wellington Hathshire Mortgage Investment Corp et al v. RussellOntario SCJ · Jun 1, 2026same court · contract + trial Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026fabricated quotes + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jason M. Hatfield, P.A. v. Tony Pirani and Pirani Law PAW.D. Arkansas · Dec 3, 2025fabricated quotes + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nady v. Al Sadi, 2026 ONSC 3760Ontario SCJ · Jun 26, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + trial Waddell (Re)Ontario SCJ · Jan 20, 2026same court · trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Every block quote in a factum must be pulled from the primary source — invented quotations trigger Law Society referrals.

Tracked discrepancy record

7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 52 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up (and misattributes authorship).

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 58 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Pita Royale Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 79 of the Reply Factum again purports to quote Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up (and misattributes the author).

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 36 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 41 of the Reply Factum purports to quote FNF Enterprises Inc. v. Wag and Train Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.

False Quotes: Case Law | Paragraph 43 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Pita Royale Inc. v. Buckingham Properties Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.?

Why does Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

Every block quote in a factum must be pulled from the primary source — invented quotations trigger Law Society referrals.

What does the public record establish about Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.?

Which source supports this Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.