HomeCasesRSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.

Ontario SCJ · Feb 4, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: lowfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Factum contained a quotation attributed to a Court of Appeal decision that could not be located in the cited decision; counsel could not produce the quoted passage when asked. Outcome: Misuse of AI potentially factored into costs.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Factum contained a quotation attributed to a Court of Appeal decision that could not be located in the cited decision; counsel could not produce the quoted passage when asked. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Principles set out in RSR's factum did not match the actual findings of Louis Jones Construction Ltd. v. Rocque, 2022 ONSC 2362; the case was mischaracterized.
Why it matters now: If counsel cannot produce the quoted passage on demand, the quote is AI-hallucinated; verify quotations against the source decision pre-filing.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

If counsel cannot produce the quoted passage on demand, the quote is AI-hallucinated; verify quotations against the source decision pre-filing.

Record details

CourtOntario SCJ

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateFeb 4, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMisuse of AI potentially factored into costs

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Misuse of AI potentially factored into costs

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Factum contained a quotation attributed to a Court of Appeal decision that could not be located in the cited decision; counsel could not produce the quoted passage when asked.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Principles set out in RSR's factum did not match the actual findings of Louis Jones Construction Ltd. v. Rocque, 2022 ONSC 2362; the case was mischaracterized.

Questions this record answers

What happened in RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Factum contained a quotation attributed to a Court of Appeal decision that could not be located in the cited decision; counsel could not produce the quoted passage when asked. Outcome: Misuse of AI potentially factored into costs.
Why does RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al. matter for legal AI risk?: If counsel cannot produce the quoted passage on demand, the quote is AI-hallucinated; verify quotations against the source decision pre-filing.
What does the public record establish about RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Nady v. Al Sadi, 2026 ONSC 3760Ontario SCJ · Jun 26, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority Wellington Hathshire Mortgage Investment Corp et al v. RussellOntario SCJ · Jun 1, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + contract Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.Ontario SCJ · Mar 10, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + contract Marper Holdings Limited v. Foxpark Development CorporationOntario SCJ · Jun 2, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + trial The Vancor Group Inc. v. 2744364 Ontario Limited et alOntario SCJ · Oct 28, 2025same court · misrepresented authority + trial Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

If counsel cannot produce the quoted passage on demand, the quote is AI-hallucinated; verify quotations against the source decision pre-filing.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Principles set out in RSR's factum did not match the actual findings of Louis Jones Construction Ltd. v. Rocque, 2022 ONSC 2362; the case was mischaracterized.

Questions this record answers

What happened in RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.?

Why does RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al. matter for legal AI risk?

If counsel cannot produce the quoted passage on demand, the quote is AI-hallucinated; verify quotations against the source decision pre-filing.

What does the public record establish about RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al.?

Which source supports this RSR Road Surface Recycling v Bonnechere Excavating et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.