HomeCasesKevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.

D. Arizona · Apr 2, 2026

AZ / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrative

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff purports to quote 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110(b) for a 180-day decision requirement, but that language does not appear; court notes the correct provision is likely 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106(e)(2). Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 2, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff purports to quote 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110(b) for a 180-day decision requirement, but that language does not appear; court notes the correct provision is likely 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106(e)(2).
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Gao v. United States, 2019 WL 11199934 (D. Ariz. Oct. 23, 2019); the Court was unable to locate this case.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Miller v. United States, 2009 WL 1532834 (D. Ariz. Apr. 30, 2009); the Court was unable to locate this case.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on 'Yomi v. United States Dept. of Health & Human Services, 970 8754 (D. Kan. 2022),' which the Court could not locate and treated as a fictitious citation.
Fabricated: Other | Court observed the plaintiff cited additional unlocatable or fictitious authorities beyond those specifically identified.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.?: Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff purports to quote 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110(b) for a 180-day decision requirement, but that language does not appear; court notes the correct provision is likely 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106(e)(2). Outcome: Warning.
Why does Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Arizona, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Federal Trade Commission v. James D. Noland, Jr., et al.D. Arizona · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Mavy v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. Arizona · Jan 13, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationD. Arizona · Sep 5, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Gustafson v. Amazon.comD. Arizona · Apr 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Transamerica Life v. WilliamsD. Arizona · Sep 6, 2024same court · pro se + fake citations Arnaoudoff v. Tivity Health IncorporatedD. Arizona · Mar 11, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Arizona

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 2, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Gao v. United States, 2019 WL 11199934 (D. Ariz. Oct. 23, 2019); the Court was unable to locate this case.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Miller v. United States, 2009 WL 1532834 (D. Ariz. Apr. 30, 2009); the Court was unable to locate this case.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on 'Yomi v. United States Dept. of Health & Human Services, 970 8754 (D. Kan. 2022),' which the Court could not locate and treated as a fictitious citation.

Fabricated: Other | Court observed the plaintiff cited additional unlocatable or fictitious authorities beyond those specifically identified.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.?

Why does Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.?

Which source supports this Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.