Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 24, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesKimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Kimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

D. Arizona · Sep 22, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | The Commissioner’s brief presented a quotation as coming from Turner, but the Court found that the quoted language does not appear in the case and flagged it as potentially AI-hallucinated.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and administrative and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fabricated quotes and administrative with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. Arizona. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | The Commissioner’s brief presented a quotation as coming from Turner, but the Court found that the quoted language does not appear in the case and flagged it as potentially AI-hallucinated.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fabricated quotes and administrative with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. Arizona. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore AZOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Arizona
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateSep 22, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | The Commissioner’s brief presented a quotation as coming from Turner, but the Court found that the quoted language does not appear in the case and flagged it as potentially AI-hallucinated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration?
False Quotes: Case Law | The Commissioner’s brief presented a quotation as coming from Turner, but the Court found that the quoted language does not appear in the case and flagged it as potentially AI-hallucinated.
Why does Kimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fabricated quotes and administrative with a recorded judicial or procedural response in D. Arizona. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kimberly Dean v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.