HomeCasesKings Roofing v. Fusion Works

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works

CA Florida (6d) · May 22, 2026

FL / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontractappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial Brief contained citations to several cases that appear to be fabricated; court directed counsel to produce copies of each cited case that actually exists. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Show Cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in CA Florida (6d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in CA Florida (6d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Florida (6d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit11th Circuit

DateMay 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial Brief contained citations to several cases that appear to be fabricated; court directed counsel to produce copies of each cited case that actually exists.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Initial Brief cited cases for inaccurate legal propositions (citations that do not support the asserted legal points).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works?: Fabricated: Case Law | Initial Brief contained citations to several cases that appear to be fabricated; court directed counsel to produce copies of each cited case that actually exists. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in CA Florida (6d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jaime Alexander Davidson v. Nayeli Nadir Chang-WarnerCA Florida (6d) · Jun 26, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Hessert v. Hessert & Wieland-PulayyaCA Florida (6d) · Mar 20, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Bruno Roberto Rodriguez v. Kathryn Louise RodriguezCA Florida (6d) · Apr 10, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Eclectic Synergy, LLC v. SeredinCA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Elilton Alves Gouveia v. Meridian Financial InvestmentsCA Florida (4th) · Mar 25, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Samantha Roussell v. The Bank of New York MellonCA Florida · Mar 11, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Florida (6d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit11th Circuit

DateMay 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Initial Brief contained citations to several cases that appear to be fabricated; court directed counsel to produce copies of each cited case that actually exists.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Initial Brief cited cases for inaccurate legal propositions (citations that do not support the asserted legal points).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works?

Why does Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works?

Which source supports this Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.