HomeCasesKevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.

10th Cir. CA · Mar 24, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesemployment

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court10th Cir. CA

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMar 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Iseminger v. Dist. Ct., 915 F.2d 1314 (10th Cir. 1990)' and 'Affolder v. Johnson, 53 F.3d 1178 (10th Cir. 1995)'; court found these reporter citations lead to different, unrelated opinions and treated them as fabrications.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Bentley v. United States, 41 F.3d 593, 604 (10th Cir. 1994)' and 'Clean Boat v. United States, 833 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2016)'; court found the pin cites lead to different actual cases and treated them as fabricated or mis-cited.
Fabricated: Case Law | Several fabricated citations in Biglow's motions (e.g., Paula Denogean, Young v. Nationstar, Singleton v. Wulff, In re Delta/Airtran, Saxena v. Allen, Jones v. State of Colorado) were identified by the court as non-existent or incorrect.
False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quote about opposing counsel preying on pro se ignorance to Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840; the court found no such language in Garrett.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Ricks v. Lindsay, 480 F.2d 538 (10th Cir. 1973)' for waiver; court found the citation actually leads to Hanley v. Four Corners Vacation Properties, Inc., 480 F.2d 536 and does not support Biglow's proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in 10th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Andria Borsody v. Frontier Heritage Communities10th Cir. CA · Jun 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Ryan-Michael Jarvis v. County of Teton Wyoming10th Cir. CA · Apr 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations David Angel Sifuentes, III v. Capital One10th Cir. CA · Feb 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Rashonna Moore v. City of Del City10th Cir. CA · Dec 3, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Chapter Kris Jackson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al.10th Cir. CA · Jun 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Thomas Carl Dodds, Jr. v. Carrie Bridges10th Cir. CA · Feb 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Iseminger v. Dist. Ct., 915 F.2d 1314 (10th Cir. 1990)' and 'Affolder v. Johnson, 53 F.3d 1178 (10th Cir. 1995)'; court found these reporter citations lead to different, unrelated opinions and treated them as fabrications.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Bentley v. United States, 41 F.3d 593, 604 (10th Cir. 1994)' and 'Clean Boat v. United States, 833 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2016)'; court found the pin cites lead to different actual cases and treated them as fabricated or mis-cited.

Fabricated: Case Law | Several fabricated citations in Biglow's motions (e.g., Paula Denogean, Young v. Nationstar, Singleton v. Wulff, In re Delta/Airtran, Saxena v. Allen, Jones v. State of Colorado) were identified by the court as non-existent or incorrect.

False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quote about opposing counsel preying on pro se ignorance to Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840; the court found no such language in Garrett.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Ricks v. Lindsay, 480 F.2d 538 (10th Cir. 1973)' for waiver; court found the citation actually leads to Hanley v. Four Corners Vacation Properties, Inc., 480 F.2d 536 and does not support Biglow's proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited 'Burton v. Ghosh, 961 F.3d 1084, 1092 (7th Cir. 2020)'; the court determined the citation does not correspond to that case and is a fabrication. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc.?

Which source supports this Kevin Lee Biglow v. Dell Technologies Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.