HomeCasesLevy v. Google LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Levy v. Google LLC

W.D. Washington · Dec 22, 2025

WA / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesemployment

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent. || Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff referenced 'Exhibit X' and 'Exhibit Y' in support of asserted meetings but did not file or locate those exhibits in the record; the court found the referenced exhibits were absent. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited and quoted language attributed to Diaz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. but provided an incorrect citation and the quoted language does not appear in the actual Diaz opinion; the court noted the citation error and that the case does not address pretext. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Villiarimo with an incorrect citation and attributed language not found in the actual Villiarimo decision; the court flagged the miscitation and misquotation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Springer v. Boeing, 138 Wash. App. 248 (1997); the court was unable to locate the case and noted the citation does not appear in legal databases. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bahrampour v. Lampert and attributed language and an employment-law proposition not present in that decision; the court noted the quotation/language does not appear in the cited opinion.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Washington

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 22, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent.
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff referenced 'Exhibit X' and 'Exhibit Y' in support of asserted meetings but did not file or locate those exhibits in the record; the court found the referenced exhibits were absent.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited and quoted language attributed to Diaz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. but provided an incorrect citation and the quoted language does not appear in the actual Diaz opinion; the court noted the citation error and that the case does not address pretext.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Villiarimo with an incorrect citation and attributed language not found in the actual Villiarimo decision; the court flagged the miscitation and misquotation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Springer v. Boeing, 138 Wash. App. 248 (1997); the court was unable to locate the case and noted the citation does not appear in legal databases.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bahrampour v. Lampert and attributed language and an employment-law proposition not present in that decision; the court noted the quotation/language does not appear in the cited opinion.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Levy v. Google LLC?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Levy v. Google LLC matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Levy v. Google LLC?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Levy v. Google LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ward v. Amazon.com Services LLCW.D. Washington · Apr 3, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Rosa Maria Cabrera Thompson v. Seattle Public SchoolsW.D. Washington · Mar 31, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Dana Serine Greene v. GSK PLCW.D. Washington · Jan 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (2)W.D. Washington · Jan 20, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations William McNae and Ronda McNae v. ARAG Insurance CompanyW.D. Washington · Nov 13, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (1)W.D. Washington · Oct 17, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Washington

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateDec 22, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff referenced 'Exhibit X' and 'Exhibit Y' in support of asserted meetings but did not file or locate those exhibits in the record; the court found the referenced exhibits were absent.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited and quoted language attributed to Diaz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc. but provided an incorrect citation and the quoted language does not appear in the actual Diaz opinion; the court noted the citation error and that the case does not address pretext.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Villiarimo with an incorrect citation and attributed language not found in the actual Villiarimo decision; the court flagged the miscitation and misquotation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Springer v. Boeing, 138 Wash. App. 248 (1997); the court was unable to locate the case and noted the citation does not appear in legal databases.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bahrampour v. Lampert and attributed language and an employment-law proposition not present in that decision; the court noted the quotation/language does not appear in the cited opinion.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Levy v. Google LLC?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kelley v. Conan, 555 F.3d 630, 634 (8th Cir. 2009); the court could not locate this case and found the citation appears to be nonexistent. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Levy v. Google LLC matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Levy v. Google LLC?

Which source supports this Levy v. Google LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.