Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (2)
W.D. Washington · Jan 20, 2026
WA / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotestort
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a Sixth Circuit case for the proposition courts may strike 'entire documents where scandalous or irrelevant matter dominates'; the court was unable to locate that case. Outcome: Struck filings.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a Sixth Circuit case for the proposition courts may strike 'entire documents where scandalous or irrelevant matter dominates'; the court was unable to locate that case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a case purportedly condemning efforts to label individuals as serial litigants; the court could not find the cited authority supporting that proposition. || Fabricated: Case Law | In a supplemental filing, plaintiffs cited a district court case for the proposition that a 'notice of unavailability' is not recognized in federal practice; the court was unable to locate the cited authority and the citation provided led to a different case. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited two Ninth Circuit opinions for the proposition that Rule 12(b) motions must be filed before a responsive pleading; the court found the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinions and was unable to locate the authorities. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a district court case allegedly stating that striking an answer 'does not resuscitate' waived defenses; the court could not locate the cited case or quote. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs attributed a quotation to a Ninth Circuit case claiming Rule 12(c) requires 'closed pleadings'; the court found that quote does not appear in the cited opinion.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Struck filings.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a Sixth Circuit case for the proposition courts may strike 'entire documents where scandalous or irrelevant matter dominates'; the court was unable to locate that case. Outcome: Struck filings.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Struck filings.
Record details
WashingtonSingle-state evidence scope
CourtW.D. Washington
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJan 20, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeStruck filings
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Struck filings
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a Sixth Circuit case for the proposition courts may strike 'entire documents where scandalous or irrelevant matter dominates'; the court was unable to locate that case.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a case purportedly condemning efforts to label individuals as serial litigants; the court could not find the cited authority supporting that proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | In a supplemental filing, plaintiffs cited a district court case for the proposition that a 'notice of unavailability' is not recognized in federal practice; the court was unable to locate the cited authority and the citation provided led to a different case.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited two Ninth Circuit opinions for the proposition that Rule 12(b) motions must be filed before a responsive pleading; the court found the quoted language does not appear in the cited opinions and was unable to locate the authorities.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a district court case allegedly stating that striking an answer 'does not resuscitate' waived defenses; the court could not locate the cited case or quote.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs attributed a quotation to a Ninth Circuit case claiming Rule 12(c) requires 'closed pleadings'; the court found that quote does not appear in the cited opinion.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (2)?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited a Sixth Circuit case for the proposition courts may strike 'entire documents where scandalous or irrelevant matter dominates'; the court was unable to locate that case. Outcome: Struck filings.
- Why does Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (2) matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in W.D. Washington, with the listed outcome: Struck filings.
- What does the public record establish about Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (2)?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (2) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.