AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 12, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 10, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesLichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Lichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc.

CA 10th Cir. · Jul 27, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesotherappellateWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Opening Brief included a citation to a legal authority that does not exist (nonexistent authority cited in Op. Br. at 39); court assumed AI use produced the fabricated citation. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment in CA 10th Cir.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Opening Brief included a citation to a legal authority that does not exist (nonexistent authority cited in Op. Br. at 39); court assumed AI use produced the fabricated citation. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment in CA 10th Cir.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA 10th Cir.
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJul 27, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Opening Brief included a citation to a legal authority that does not exist (nonexistent authority cited in Op. Br. at 39); court assumed AI use produced the fabricated citation.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Opening Brief characterized two existing cases in manners unsupported by their texts (misstatements/false attributions noted at Op. Br. 43, 45).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Opening Brief included a citation to a legal authority that does not exist (nonexistent authority cited in Op. Br. at 39); court assumed AI use produced the fabricated citation. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Lichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment in CA 10th Cir.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Lichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Lichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.CA 10th Cir. · Jul 29, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesHoagland Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Clear LakeCA Indiana · Jun 22, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ngaruiya v. GillCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 16, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Jean-Paul B. Kalonji v. State of IndianaCA Indiana · May 26, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)In the Matter of the Estate of KuerschnerCA Arizona · Mar 5, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)In the Matter of the Estate of Arturo LopezCA Arizona · Feb 27, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)