AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 5, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 31, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesShantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.

CA 10th Cir. · Jul 29, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Reynolds v. Smith, 62 F.3d 1421 (10th Cir. 1995)'; the court identified this as a fabricated authority.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA 10th Cir.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Reynolds v. Smith, 62 F.3d 1421 (10th Cir. 1995)'; the court identified this as a fabricated authority.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA 10th Cir.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA 10th Cir.
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJul 29, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Reynolds v. Smith, 62 F.3d 1421 (10th Cir. 1995)'; the court identified this as a fabricated authority.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Navajo Nation Oil & Gas Co. v. Window Rock Unified Sch. Dist., 638 F. App'x 698 (10th Cir. 2016),' but the reporter page corresponded to a different case (Sayed v. Broman); the citation was incorrect/misrepresented.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Lewis v. Clarke that does not appear in the opinion, i.e., a misquoted/false attribution.
  4. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff admitted submitting a photo exhibit that was 'not authentic' in support of stalking allegations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Reynolds v. Smith, 62 F.3d 1421 (10th Cir. 1995)'; the court identified this as a fabricated authority.
Why does Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA 10th Cir.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Shantell Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Lichfield v. Kubler; Netflix, Inc.CA 10th Cir. · Jul 27, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesKhan v. Howard County BAPCA Maryland · Jul 20, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Teresa Jewel Whitten v. Kristopher Brian EverittCA Kentucky · Jul 10, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc.CA Illinois · Jun 30, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. James K. Bernard Jr.CA Illinois · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ex parte A.I.F.-H. f/k/a A.I.F.CA Alabama · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)