Which source supports this Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesLindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy

Evidence review: primary document limited. The primary document was retrieved, but one or more case-level facts could not be tied to a page-located passage. The structured corpus baseline is preserved without upgrading those claims.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy

E.D. California · Jan 14, 2026

CA / federal Editorial impact: low fake citations immigration trial None Adjudicated

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed other filings by the attorney contained similar non-existent case citations.
Why it matters now: Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Operational lesson

Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Explore CAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtE.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 14, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed other filings by the attorney contained similar non-existent case citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.
Why does Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy matter for legal AI risk?: Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.
What does the public record establish about Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

That Xiong v. Minga Wofford (1)E.D. California · Jan 22, 2026same court · fake citations + immigration Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyE.D. California · Jul 24, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Pyle v. Glenn County Sheriff's DepartmentE.D. California · May 12, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Shaw v. City of Portola, et al.E.D. California · Apr 14, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Gamez v. County of FresnoE.D. California · Apr 6, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document limited

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open E.D. California profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology