HomeCasesLindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy

E.D. California · Jan 14, 2026

CA / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsimmigrationtrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed other filings by the attorney contained similar non-existent case citations.
Why it matters now: Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Operational lesson

Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtE.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 14, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed other filings by the attorney contained similar non-existent case citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.
Why does Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy matter for legal AI risk?: Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.
What does the public record establish about Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

That Xiong v. Minga Wofford (1)E.D. California · Jan 22, 2026same court · fake citations + immigration Pyle v. Glenn County Sheriff's DepartmentE.D. California · May 12, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Shaw v. City of Portola, et al.E.D. California · Apr 14, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Gamez v. County of FresnoE.D. California · Apr 6, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Juan Villalovos-Gutierrez, et al. v. Gerard Van de Pol, et al. (2)E.D. California · Feb 24, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Operational lesson

Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtE.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 14, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed other filings by the attorney contained similar non-existent case citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'Zepeda Rivas v. Jennings, No. 1:20-cv-02731-JLT, 2020 WL 2537748, at 6 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2020)'; the court found no such case exists.

Why does Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy matter for legal AI risk?

Pattern of fake citations across multiple filings exposes attorneys to cross-case sanctions; audit all recent briefs.

What does the public record establish about Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy?

Which source supports this Lindalbeth Lopez Hernandez v. Leanna Lundy summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.