Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1)
D. New Mexico · Sep 22, 2025
NM / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycivil rights
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | A quotation attributed to Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452 (10th Cir. 1994) was presented though the quoted language does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Monetary sanction; self-report to state bars. Original Show Cause Order is here. Court noted that Counsel was still citing fabricated authorities, even though show cause proceedings are ongoing in parallel.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary sanction; self-report to state bars; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Self-reporting to state bars is now a standard add-on sanction — stop using AI while show-cause is pending, or the penalty compounds.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | A quotation attributed to Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452 (10th Cir. 1994) was presented though the quoted language does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Monetary sanction; self-report to state bars. Original Show Cause Order is here. Court noted that Counsel was still citing fabricated authorities, even though show cause proceedings are ongoing in parallel.
Operational lesson
Self-reporting to state bars is now a standard add-on sanction — stop using AI while show-cause is pending, or the penalty compounds.
Record details
New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. New Mexico
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateSep 22, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary sanction; self-report to state bars
Known amount$3,000
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary sanction; self-report to state bars
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
11 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | A quotation attributed to Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452 (10th Cir. 1994) was presented though the quoted language does not appear in that opinion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Characterized Gates Rubber as imposing sanctions for failure to supplement discovery; the Court states sanctions there were for intentional destruction of evidence.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Relied on a non-existent case, as admitted in a prior filing and noted by the Court.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Relied on a non-existent case, as admitted in a prior filing and noted by the Court.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Previously submitted misattributed citation noted by the Court.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Previously submitted misattributed citation noted by the Court.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Relied on a non-existent case, as admitted in a prior filing and noted by the Court.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Qualcomm for an attorney’s general duty to ensure clients conduct a comprehensive document search; the Court notes Qualcomm addressed a patent owner’s disclosure duty and litigation misconduct, not a general civil discovery duty.
Show 3 additional discrepancies
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Qualcomm for the proposition that sanctions serve remedial and deterrent purposes; the Court states Qualcomm does not discuss discovery sanctions.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Described Dominion Video as emphasizing procedural compliance in litigation conduct; the Court explains it was a merits decision on a preliminary injunction and intervention, not a procedural/discovery ruling.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Quoted parenthetical attributed to Zubulake that does not appear in the opinion, per the Court.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1)?
- False Quotes: Case Law | A quotation attributed to Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452 (10th Cir. 1994) was presented though the quoted language does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Monetary sanction; self-report to state bars. Original Show Cause Order is here. Court noted that Counsel was still citing fabricated authorities, even though show cause proceedings are ongoing in parallel.
- Why does Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1) matter for legal AI risk?
- Self-reporting to state bars is now a standard add-on sanction — stop using AI while show-cause is pending, or the penalty compounds.
- What does the public record establish about Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.