Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 29, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesLMT Property Investors Ltd v Revenue Scotland
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

LMT Property Investors Ltd v Revenue Scotland

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Natural & Artificial Intelligence in Law; linked document: naturalandartificiallaw.com. What AI Vortex adds.

Scotland Tax Chamber · May 1, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The Appellant cited paragraphs 42–45 of the non-existent case Grahame v Revenue Scotland. The Tribunal expressly identified the case as fabricated and explained that AI can produce such hallucinations.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and tax and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and tax with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Scotland Tax Chamber. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The Appellant cited paragraphs 42–45 of the non-existent case Grahame v Revenue Scotland. The Tribunal expressly identified the case as fabricated and explained that AI can produce such hallucinations.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and tax with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Scotland Tax Chamber. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtScotland Tax Chamber
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMay 1, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The Appellant cited paragraphs 42–45 of the non-existent case Grahame v Revenue Scotland. The Tribunal expressly identified the case as fabricated and explained that AI can produce such hallucinations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in LMT Property Investors Ltd v Revenue Scotland?
Fabricated: Case Law | The Appellant cited paragraphs 42–45 of the non-existent case Grahame v Revenue Scotland. The Tribunal expressly identified the case as fabricated and explained that AI can produce such hallucinations.
Why does LMT Property Investors Ltd v Revenue Scotland matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and tax with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Scotland Tax Chamber. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about LMT Property Investors Ltd v Revenue Scotland?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this LMT Property Investors Ltd v Revenue Scotland summary?
The recorded source is naturalandartificiallaw.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.