Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Lozano González v. Roberge
Housing Administrative Tribunal · May 1, 2025
CanadaEditorial impact: lowfabricated quotesadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Legal Norm | False translation of Articles 1960 and 1962 from the Code civil du Québec. The landlord sought to repossess a rental property, claiming the lease renewal was suspended based on a misinterpretation of Quebec's civil code articles. He used ChatGPT to translate these articles, which resulted in a completely different meaning. The Tribunal found the repossession request invalid as it was based on a date prior to the lease's end. The Tribunal rejected the claim of abuse, accepting the landlord's sincere belief in his misinterpretation, influenced by AI translation, and noted his language barrier and residence in Mexico.…
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- AI translations of foreign-language statutes are unreliable—always engage qualified counsel for cross-border civil code interpretation.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Legal Norm | False translation of Articles 1960 and 1962 from the Code civil du Québec. The landlord sought to repossess a rental property, claiming the lease renewal was suspended based on a misinterpretation of Quebec's civil code articles. He used ChatGPT to translate these articles, which resulted in a completely different meaning. The Tribunal found the repossession request invalid as it was based on a date prior to the lease's end. The Tribunal rejected the claim of abuse, accepting the landlord's sincere belief in his misinterpretation, influenced by AI translation, and noted his language barrier and residence in Mexico. The Tribunal advised the landlord to seek reliable legal advice in the future.
Operational lesson
AI translations of foreign-language statutes are unreliable—always engage qualified counsel for cross-border civil code interpretation.
Record details
CourtHousing Administrative Tribunal
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMay 1, 2025
CH
AI toolChatGPT
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | False translation of Articles 1960 and 1962 from the Code civil du Québec.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Lozano González v. Roberge?
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | False translation of Articles 1960 and 1962 from the Code civil du Québec. The landlord sought to repossess a rental property, claiming the lease renewal was suspended based on a misinterpretation of Quebec's civil code articles. He used ChatGPT to translate these articles, which resulted in a completely different meaning. The Tribunal found the repossession request invalid as it was based on a date prior to the lease's end. The Tribunal rejected the claim of abuse, accepting the landlord's sincere belief in his misinterpretation, influenced by AI translation, and noted his language barrier and residence in Mexico.…
- Why does Lozano González v. Roberge matter for legal AI risk?
- AI translations of foreign-language statutes are unreliable—always engage qualified counsel for cross-border civil code interpretation.
- What does the public record establish about Lozano González v. Roberge?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Lozano González v. Roberge summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.