HomeCasesQQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)

Administrative Review Tribunal · May 22, 2026

AustraliaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrative

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'PLSM v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 4156' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in Administrative Review Tribunal, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in Administrative Review Tribunal, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtAdministrative Review Tribunal

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateMay 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'PLSM v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 4156' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.
Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'EEZK v National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] AATA 1909' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'Hyde v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 4143' but the citation pointed to an unrelated taxation decision; Tribunal noted mismatch and that the relevant authority is Hyde (Guidance and Appeals Panel) [2025] ARTA 2597.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'Chief Executive Officer of the National Disability Insurance Agency v Eastham [2018] FCAFC 175'; Tribunal treated this as a mis-citation and took the correct reference to be Chief Executive Officer of the National Disability Insurance Agency v Eastham [2026] FCA 147.
Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'AHPF v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 3867' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'National Disability Insurance Agency v WRMF [2020] FCA 16' which was an incorrect citation; Tribunal treated the appropriate authority as National Disability Insurance Agency v WRMF [2020] FCAFC 79.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'National Disability Insurance Agency v Davies [2019] FCA 1424' which was an incorrect citation; Tribunal took the intended reference to be National Disability Insurance Agency v Davis [2022] FCA 1002.

Questions this record answers

What happened in QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'PLSM v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 4156' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.
Why does QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS) matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in Administrative Review Tribunal, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Body by Michael Pty Ltd and Industry Innovation and Science AustraliaAdministrative Review Tribunal · Jan 24, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Smith and Commissioner of TaxationAdministrative Review Tribunal · Jan 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations 14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Chilly Moose Ltd. v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Moosehead Breweries Limited v 14095863 Canada Inc.Trademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)M. D... A. c. Département de l'IsèreTA Grenoble · Jun 4, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'EEZK v National Disability Insurance Agency [2023] AATA 1909' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'Hyde v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 4143' but the citation pointed to an unrelated taxation decision; Tribunal noted mismatch and that the relevant authority is Hyde (Guidance and Appeals Panel) [2025] ARTA 2597.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'Chief Executive Officer of the National Disability Insurance Agency v Eastham [2018] FCAFC 175'; Tribunal treated this as a mis-citation and took the correct reference to be Chief Executive Officer of the National Disability Insurance Agency v Eastham [2026] FCA 147.

Fabricated: Case Law | Representative cited 'AHPF v National Disability Insurance Agency [2022] AATA 3867' which does not exist; Tribunal found the citation refers to an unrelated migration case and is erroneous.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'National Disability Insurance Agency v WRMF [2020] FCA 16' which was an incorrect citation; Tribunal treated the appropriate authority as National Disability Insurance Agency v WRMF [2020] FCAFC 79.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Representative cited 'National Disability Insurance Agency v Davies [2019] FCA 1424' which was an incorrect citation; Tribunal took the intended reference to be National Disability Insurance Agency v Davis [2022] FCA 1002.

Questions this record answers

What happened in QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)?

Why does QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS) matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS)?

Which source supports this QQQJ and National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIS) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.