Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
M7 Indústria e Comércio de Compensados e Laminados v. U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition, et al.
S.D. New York · Mar 9, 2026
NY / federalEditorial impact: mediumfabricated quotescontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' memorandum attributed this quoted passage to NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Order to show cause. The Court found two quotations in the Plaintiffs' memorandum that do not appear in the cited federal opinions and ordered counsel to explain and certify review of all cited cases before deciding whether to impose further sanctions.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Order to show cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Certify in writing that every quoted passage was read in the cited opinion; show-cause orders follow when quotes cannot be located.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' memorandum attributed this quoted passage to NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Order to show cause. The Court found two quotations in the Plaintiffs' memorandum that do not appear in the cited federal opinions and ordered counsel to explain and certify review of all cited cases before deciding whether to impose further sanctions.
Operational lesson
Certify in writing that every quoted passage was read in the cited opinion; show-cause orders follow when quotes cannot be located.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateMar 9, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to show cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to show cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' memorandum attributed this quoted passage to NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' memorandum attributed this quoted passage to Int’l Railways of Cent. Am. v. United Brands Co., but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that opinion.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in M7 Indústria e Comércio de Compensados e Laminados v. U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' memorandum attributed this quoted passage to NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, but the Court found the quotation does not appear in that opinion. Outcome: Order to show cause. The Court found two quotations in the Plaintiffs' memorandum that do not appear in the cited federal opinions and ordered counsel to explain and certify review of all cited cases before deciding whether to impose further sanctions.
- Why does M7 Indústria e Comércio de Compensados e Laminados v. U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- Certify in writing that every quoted passage was read in the cited opinion; show-cause orders follow when quotes cannot be located.
- What does the public record establish about M7 Indústria e Comércio de Compensados e Laminados v. U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this M7 Indústria e Comércio de Compensados e Laminados v. U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.