Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Marquez v. Dreiling
D. Kansas · Jun 29, 2026
KS / federalEditorial impact: lowfabricated quotescivil rightstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's brief quoted a passage as from Schmidt v. Huff that the court found does not appear in the Schmidt opinion; court noted the false quote and declined to sanction. Outcome: No sanction imposed.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is No sanction imposed; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and civil rights involving AI (implied, unspecified) with No sanction imposed in D. Kansas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's brief quoted a passage as from Schmidt v. Huff that the court found does not appear in the Schmidt opinion; court noted the false quote and declined to sanction. Outcome: No sanction imposed.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fabricated quotes and civil rights involving AI (implied, unspecified) with No sanction imposed in D. Kansas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
KansasSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Kansas
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJun 29, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeNo sanction imposed
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
No sanction imposed
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's brief quoted a passage as from Schmidt v. Huff that the court found does not appear in the Schmidt opinion; court noted the false quote and declined to sanction.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Marquez v. Dreiling?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff's brief quoted a passage as from Schmidt v. Huff that the court found does not appear in the Schmidt opinion; court noted the false quote and declined to sanction. Outcome: No sanction imposed.
- Why does Marquez v. Dreiling matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and civil rights involving AI (implied, unspecified) with No sanction imposed in D. Kansas, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Marquez v. Dreiling?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Marquez v. Dreiling summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.