HomeCasesSammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO

D. Kansas · Jan 6, 2026

KS / federalEditorial impact: mediumfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritytorttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Mason v. Gerin Corp. that is not found in the opinion; court flagged it as inaccurate. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Fanning v. Sitton Motor Lines as containing language about showing 'some cognitive awareness' that the opinion does not contain; court noted the misquotation. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a phrase about 'even the movement of the toes or legs of the decedent' to Cochrane v. Schneider Nat’l that does not exist in that opinion; court flagged it. || False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Lemmons v. Board of County Comm’rs for a relation-back principle quotation that is absent from that decision; court identified the inaccuracy. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Pape v. Kansas Power & Light Co. with an incorrect citation number; court noted the citation was not correct.
Why it matters now: Five fabricated quotations in one brief triggers show-cause — require line-by-line quote verification against the source opinion.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Operational lesson

Five fabricated quotations in one brief triggers show-cause — require line-by-line quote verification against the source opinion.

Record details

KansasSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Kansas

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateJan 6, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Mason v. Gerin Corp. that is not found in the opinion; court flagged it as inaccurate.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Fanning v. Sitton Motor Lines as containing language about showing 'some cognitive awareness' that the opinion does not contain; court noted the misquotation.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a phrase about 'even the movement of the toes or legs of the decedent' to Cochrane v. Schneider Nat’l that does not exist in that opinion; court flagged it.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Lemmons v. Board of County Comm’rs for a relation-back principle quotation that is absent from that decision; court identified the inaccuracy.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Pape v. Kansas Power & Light Co. with an incorrect citation number; court noted the citation was not correct.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO matter for legal AI risk?: Five fabricated quotations in one brief triggers show-cause — require line-by-line quote verification against the source opinion.
What does the public record establish about Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Lexos Media IP, LLC v. Overstock.com, Inc.D. Kansas · Feb 2, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + misrepresented authority Marquez v. DreilingD. Kansas · Jun 29, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + trial Justin Spiehs v. Erik SmithD. Kansas · Apr 29, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + trial Ford v. Sherwin-WilliamsD. Kansas · Mar 31, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + trial Zesiger v. Kansas et al.D. Kansas · Mar 17, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + trial Kennon v. AshleyD. Kansas · Feb 18, 2026same court · fabricated quotes + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Operational lesson

Five fabricated quotations in one brief triggers show-cause — require line-by-line quote verification against the source opinion.

Record details

KansasSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Kansas

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateJan 6, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a quotation to Mason v. Gerin Corp. that is not found in the opinion; court flagged it as inaccurate.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Fanning v. Sitton Motor Lines as containing language about showing 'some cognitive awareness' that the opinion does not contain; court noted the misquotation.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed a phrase about 'even the movement of the toes or legs of the decedent' to Cochrane v. Schneider Nat’l that does not exist in that opinion; court flagged it.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted Lemmons v. Board of County Comm’rs for a relation-back principle quotation that is absent from that decision; court identified the inaccuracy.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Pape v. Kansas Power & Light Co. with an incorrect citation number; court noted the citation was not correct.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff quoted a passage attributed to Cory v. Troth that does not appear in that opinion; court identified the quotation as inaccurate. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why does Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO matter for legal AI risk?

Five fabricated quotations in one brief triggers show-cause — require line-by-line quote verification against the source opinion.

What does the public record establish about Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO?

Which source supports this Sammie Dwayne McPhaul v. College Hills OPCO summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.