Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. v. Dennis Michael Philipson
W.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2025
TN / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Pro se defendant cited 'First Nat'l Bank of Polk Cnty. v. Goss, No. E2008-01530-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 2046052 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 15, 2009)' and provided a quoted passage; the court found that citation does not exist as cited and the quoted language is not in the real 1995 Goss opinion, concluding the citation and quote were likely fabricated by AI. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in W.D. Tennessee, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Pro se defendant cited 'First Nat'l Bank of Polk Cnty. v. Goss, No. E2008-01530-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 2046052 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 15, 2009)' and provided a quoted passage; the court found that citation does not exist as cited and the quoted language is not in the real 1995 Goss opinion, concluding the citation and quote were likely fabricated by AI. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in W.D. Tennessee, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
TennesseeSingle-state evidence scope
CourtW.D. Tennessee
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit6th Circuit
DateSep 11, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Pro se defendant cited 'First Nat'l Bank of Polk Cnty. v. Goss, No. E2008-01530-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 2046052 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 15, 2009)' and provided a quoted passage; the court found that citation does not exist as cited and the quoted language is not in the real 1995 Goss opinion, concluding the citation and quote were likely fabricated by AI.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. v. Dennis Michael Philipson?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Pro se defendant cited 'First Nat'l Bank of Polk Cnty. v. Goss, No. E2008-01530-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 2046052 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 15, 2009)' and provided a quoted passage; the court found that citation does not exist as cited and the quoted language is not in the real 1995 Goss opinion, concluding the citation and quote were likely fabricated by AI. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. v. Dennis Michael Philipson matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in W.D. Tennessee, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. v. Dennis Michael Philipson?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. v. Dennis Michael Philipson summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.