Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Mr T De Carvalho Ferreira v Magic Life Limited & Ors
Employment Tribunals (Reading) · Dec 12, 2025
GBEditorial impact: lowfake citationsemploymenttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant's skeleton cited 'Adams v Wincanton Group Ltd [2013] IRLR 725 (EAT)'; the judge and opposing counsel were unable to locate the case; counsel acknowledged using AI and was warned to verify AI outputs. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant's skeleton cited 'Adams v Wincanton Group Ltd [2013] IRLR 725 (EAT)'; the judge and opposing counsel were unable to locate the case; counsel acknowledged using AI and was warned to verify AI outputs.
- Why it matters now
- Employment Tribunals warn on first offence; the warning is discoverable and weaponized at the next sanctions hearing.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant's skeleton cited 'Adams v Wincanton Group Ltd [2013] IRLR 725 (EAT)'; the judge and opposing counsel were unable to locate the case; counsel acknowledged using AI and was warned to verify AI outputs. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
Employment Tribunals warn on first offence; the warning is discoverable and weaponized at the next sanctions hearing.
Record details
CourtEmployment Tribunals (Reading)
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateDec 12, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant's skeleton cited 'Adams v Wincanton Group Ltd [2013] IRLR 725 (EAT)'; the judge and opposing counsel were unable to locate the case; counsel acknowledged using AI and was warned to verify AI outputs.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Mr T De Carvalho Ferreira v Magic Life Limited & Ors?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant's skeleton cited 'Adams v Wincanton Group Ltd [2013] IRLR 725 (EAT)'; the judge and opposing counsel were unable to locate the case; counsel acknowledged using AI and was warned to verify AI outputs. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Mr T De Carvalho Ferreira v Magic Life Limited & Ors matter for legal AI risk?
- Employment Tribunals warn on first offence; the warning is discoverable and weaponized at the next sanctions hearing.
- What does the public record establish about Mr T De Carvalho Ferreira v Magic Life Limited & Ors?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Mr T De Carvalho Ferreira v Magic Life Limited & Ors summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.