HomeCasesOrtiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros

JCC de Tucumán · Feb 2, 2026

ArgentinaEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referraltorttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the cited precedent; provided links were unclear or redirected to other cases and the decision was not found in databases. Outcome: Monetary sanction, bar referral, adverse costs order.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the cited precedent; provided links were unclear or redirected to other cases and the decision was not found in databases. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation accompanied by SAIJ id/link that corresponded to a different case (Yanson v. Firenze Viajes) and the invoked precedent was not located in databases. || Fabricated: Case Law | No copy or adequate identification supplied; searches in usual jurisprudential databases failed to locate the cited decision. || Fabricated: Case Law | Generic citation without sala, jurisdiction or date; not found in consulted jurisprudential databases and no supporting copy provided. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited generically without minimal individualization and not located in standard legal databases. || Fabricated: Case Law | Citation not accompanied by verifiable copy and not found in the reviewed jurisprudential sources.
Why it matters now: Attach verifiable copies and full citations (sala, jurisdiction, date) for every precedent; generic AI-style cites trigger sanctions and bar referral.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Attach verifiable copies and full citations (sala, jurisdiction, date) for every precedent; generic AI-style cites trigger sanctions and bar referral.

Record details

CourtJCC de Tucumán

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateFeb 2, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary sanction, bar referral, adverse costs order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary sanction, bar referral, adverse costs order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the cited precedent; provided links were unclear or redirected to other cases and the decision was not found in databases.
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation accompanied by SAIJ id/link that corresponded to a different case (Yanson v. Firenze Viajes) and the invoked precedent was not located in databases.
Fabricated: Case Law | No copy or adequate identification supplied; searches in usual jurisprudential databases failed to locate the cited decision.
Fabricated: Case Law | Generic citation without sala, jurisdiction or date; not found in consulted jurisprudential databases and no supporting copy provided.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited generically without minimal individualization and not located in standard legal databases.
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation not accompanied by verifiable copy and not found in the reviewed jurisprudential sources.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the cited precedent; provided links were unclear or redirected to other cases and the decision was not found in databases. Outcome: Monetary sanction, bar referral, adverse costs order.
Why does Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros matter for legal AI risk?: Attach verifiable copies and full citations (sala, jurisdiction, date) for every precedent; generic AI-style cites trigger sanctions and bar referral.
What does the public record establish about Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Reaves Law Firm, PLLC v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, et al.W.D. Tennessee · Jun 2, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nelson L. Bruce v. The United StatesD. South Carolina · Feb 9, 2026fake citations + bar referral · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.D. New Mexico · May 1, 2026fake citations + bar referral Cartagena v. Dixon, Blackburn, and T.A. Blackburn Law (1)S.D. New York · Mar 10, 2026fake citations + bar referral Liza Gardner v. Sean Combs, et al.D. New Jersey · Dec 15, 2025fake citations + bar referral Loftong v. Grove FarmsCC Minnesota · Sep 26, 2025fake citations + bar referral

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Attach verifiable copies and full citations (sala, jurisdiction, date) for every precedent; generic AI-style cites trigger sanctions and bar referral.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court could not verify the cited precedent; provided links were unclear or redirected to other cases and the decision was not found in databases.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation accompanied by SAIJ id/link that corresponded to a different case (Yanson v. Firenze Viajes) and the invoked precedent was not located in databases.

Fabricated: Case Law | No copy or adequate identification supplied; searches in usual jurisprudential databases failed to locate the cited decision.

Fabricated: Case Law | Generic citation without sala, jurisdiction or date; not found in consulted jurisprudential databases and no supporting copy provided.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited generically without minimal individualization and not located in standard legal databases.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation not accompanied by verifiable copy and not found in the reviewed jurisprudential sources.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros?

Why does Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros matter for legal AI risk?

Attach verifiable copies and full citations (sala, jurisdiction, date) for every precedent; generic AI-style cites trigger sanctions and bar referral.

What does the public record establish about Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros?

Which source supports this Ortiz Fatima Cecilia v. Booking.com y otros summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.