HomeCasesRasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.

D. New Mexico · May 1, 2026

NM / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referraltorttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified the citation as non-existent and could not locate any corresponding case under variant spellings. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE. First order to Show Cause is here.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving Unidentified with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving Unidentified with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Mexico

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMay 1, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified the citation as non-existent and could not locate any corresponding case under variant spellings.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found no record of the cited Tenth Circuit decision and identified it as apparently non-existent.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court determined the referenced Tenth Circuit citation could not be located and appears fabricated.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court concluded the cited D. Colo. decision could not be found and appears to be a non-existent case.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified the citation as non-existent and could not locate any corresponding case under variant spellings. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE. First order to Show Cause is here.
Why does Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving Unidentified with Monetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE in D. New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Dehghani v. CastroD. New Mexico · Apr 2, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Sample et al v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings, IncD. New Mexico · May 26, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (2)D. New Mexico · May 21, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Danielle L. Neri v. Board of Education for Albuquerque Public SchoolsD. New Mexico · May 7, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.D. New Mexico · Nov 25, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Lowrey v. City of Rio Rancho et al. (1)D. New Mexico · Nov 5, 2025same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. New Mexico

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMay 1, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Bar Referral; CLE

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified the citation as non-existent and could not locate any corresponding case under variant spellings.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found no record of the cited Tenth Circuit decision and identified it as apparently non-existent.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court determined the referenced Tenth Circuit citation could not be located and appears fabricated.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court concluded the cited D. Colo. decision could not be found and appears to be a non-existent case.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.?

Why does Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.?

Which source supports this Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.