Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 16, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesPablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Pablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda.

TJ Goias · Mar 17, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant attributed a civil-law proposition to STJ AgInt no REsp 1.918.894/SP, but the cited process deals with criminal law and does not contain the attributed content. Outcome: Monetary Fine.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and contract and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects misrepresented authority and contract with Monetary Fine in TJ Goias. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant attributed a civil-law proposition to STJ AgInt no REsp 1.918.894/SP, but the cited process deals with criminal law and does not contain the attributed content. Outcome: Monetary Fine.

Operational lesson

This matter connects misrepresented authority and contract with Monetary Fine in TJ Goias. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTJ Goias
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMar 17, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant attributed a civil-law proposition to STJ AgInt no REsp 1.918.894/SP, but the cited process deals with criminal law and does not contain the attributed content.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Pablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda.?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant attributed a civil-law proposition to STJ AgInt no REsp 1.918.894/SP, but the cited process deals with criminal law and does not contain the attributed content. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
Why does Pablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects misrepresented authority and contract with Monetary Fine in TJ Goias. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Pablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Pablo Alexandre Martins dos Santos v. Viver Bem Empreendimentos Imobiliários e Participações Ltda. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.