Which source supports this Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesLubarsky v. FCA US, LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Mary Matuszak; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

C.D. California · Oct 19, 2026

CA / federal Editorial impact: medium fabricated quotes misrepresented authority contract trial Ordered To Show Cause

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | The Joint Brief used a quotation that did not correspond to the cited decision, Auguste v. BMW of North America, LLC. The court ordered Defendant to show cause regarding a possible $100 sanction. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records Order to Show Cause. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Order to Show Cause in C.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Order to Show Cause in C.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Explore CAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateOct 19, 2026

AI toolNo tool named in source

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to Show Cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Order to Show Cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | The Joint Brief used a quotation that did not correspond to the cited decision, Auguste v. BMW of North America, LLC. The court ordered Defendant to show cause regarding a possible $100 sanction.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC?: Misrepresented: Case Law | The Joint Brief used a quotation that did not correspond to the cited decision, Auguste v. BMW of North America, LLC. The court ordered Defendant to show cause regarding a possible $100 sanction. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Why does Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with Order to Show Cause in C.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Nov 3, 2026 · Published Nov 3, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Nov 3, 2026; latest tracked decision Oct 29, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open C.D. California profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Case Record: Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC (October 19, 2026), Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases/lubarsky-v-fca-us-llc-2026-10-19 (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Case Record: Lubarsky v. FCA US, LLC (October 19, 2026). Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases/lubarsky-v-fca-us-llc-2026-10-19
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases/lubarsky-v-fca-us-llc-2026-10-19 (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.