AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 4, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesPaulk v. Larva Labs, LLC
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Paulk v. Larva Labs, LLC

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Volokh; linked document: reason.com. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

S.D. Florida · Jun 18, 2026

FL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritytortNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that notice to a company's chief legal representative prevents vacatur of a default based on administrative breakdown. The Court verified that “Snapper v. Redan, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)” does not exist. Outcome: Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement in S.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that notice to a company's chief legal representative prevents vacatur of a default based on administrative breakdown. The Court verified that “Snapper v. Redan, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)” does not exist. Outcome: Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement in S.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtS.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateJun 18, 2026
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomePreapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that notice to a company's chief legal representative prevents vacatur of a default based on administrative breakdown. The Court verified that “Snapper v. Redan, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)” does not exist.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed to the existing case Snapper, Inc. v. Redan a rule concerning vacatur of default, notice, and mail. The Court explained that the case instead concerns federal appellate jurisdiction over remand orders involving contractual forum-selection clauses and says nothing about vacatur, default, or mail.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Paulk v. Larva Labs, LLC?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case for the proposition that notice to a company's chief legal representative prevents vacatur of a default based on administrative breakdown. The Court verified that “Snapper v. Redan, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)” does not exist. Outcome: Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement.
Why does Paulk v. Larva Labs, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Preapproval requirements and a handwritten-opposition requirement in S.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Paulk v. Larva Labs, LLC?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Paulk v. Larva Labs, LLC summary?
The recorded source is reason.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Mitchell Taylor Button & Dusty Button v. Sigrid McCawleyS.D. Florida · Feb 4, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsMultiphone Latin America v. Millicom International CellularS.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityWhyte et al. v. MK United, Inc. et al.S.D. Florida · Jul 13, 2026same court · fake citations + tortJoseph C. Zoghaib v. Societe Generale De Banque Au Liban, et al.S.D. Florida · Apr 8, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityJorge A. Zea v. National Association of REALTORSS.D. Florida · Mar 24, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityJuandel Pena and Martina Ruiz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.S.D. Florida · Feb 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.