Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited
Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board · Jul 21, 2025
CanadaEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authorityadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
The Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board found that several authorities in a review request could not be located; two supplied neutral citations instead pointed to unrelated decisions, and a cited Rule 29 did not exist because the Board’s Rules had only 27 rules. It warned that the representative’s lack of diligence could be an abuse of process and lead to personal costs, then dismissed the review request.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Every neutral citation must be clicked and read; AI frequently generates real-looking citations pointing to unrelated cases.
Why this matter is tracked
The Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board found that several authorities in a review request could not be located; two supplied neutral citations instead pointed to unrelated decisions, and a cited Rule 29 did not exist because the Board’s Rules had only 27 rules. It warned that the representative’s lack of diligence could be an abuse of process and lead to personal costs, then dismissed the review request.
Operational lesson
Every neutral citation must be clicked and read; AI frequently generates real-looking citations pointing to unrelated cases.
Record details
CourtOntario Landlord and Tenant Board
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 21, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited LTB decision could not be located on CanLII.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent case; neutral citation actually belongs to an unrelated case (TD Bank v. Ottlantis Inc.).
- Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent case; neutral citation/hyperlink points to R. v. T.T., 2009 ONCA 613, unrelated to the stated proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Case and neutral citation not found on CanLII.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Case and neutral citation not found on CanLII.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Relied on a non-existent procedural rule; the Board’s Rules contain only 27 rules.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Claimed the order determined the unit is governed by the Innkeepers Act; the order made no such finding.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited?
- The Ontario Landlord and Tenant Board found that several authorities in a review request could not be located; two supplied neutral citations instead pointed to unrelated decisions, and a cited Rule 29 did not exist because the Board’s Rules had only 27 rules. It warned that the representative’s lack of diligence could be an abuse of process and lead to personal costs, then dismissed the review request.
- Why does Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited matter for legal AI risk?
- Every neutral citation must be clicked and read; AI frequently generates real-looking citations pointing to unrelated cases.
- What does the public record establish about Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.