Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Plonit et al. v. The Administrator General in the Tel Aviv District et al.
Family Court in Petah Tikva · Jul 3, 2025
IsraelEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotesfamilytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent appellate case was cited to show executor's duty to avoid conflicts; court's database search found no such judgment. Outcome: Monetary Penalty.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Penalty; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Verify every doctrinal quote against the physical treatise; AI invents both cases and scholarly passages.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent appellate case was cited to show executor's duty to avoid conflicts; court's database search found no such judgment. Outcome: Monetary Penalty.
Operational lesson
Verify every doctrinal quote against the physical treatise; AI invents both cases and scholarly passages.
Record details
CourtFamily Court in Petah Tikva
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 3, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Penalty
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Monetary Penalty
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
11 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent appellate case was cited to show executor's duty to avoid conflicts; court's database search found no such judgment.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent Supreme Court case was cited on executor obligations; court confirmed the citation could not be located in legal databases.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent Supreme Court case was cited regarding executor duties; court found no trace of the case.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated family court case (Haifa) cited to support neutrality and fiduciary duties; court found it does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Fabricated Tel Aviv family court case cited on executor conduct; court determined no such decision exists.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Non-existent scholarly source by Justice Barak on the Trusts Law was quoted for executor neutrality; court could not locate the work or the quote.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Fabricated citation to Barak's book 'Nehmanut' was used to support neutrality; court found no such source/quote.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Fabricated references to Shmuel Shilo's commentary on the Inheritance Law were cited; court found neither the specific quotes nor supporting pages.
Show 3 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Fabricated reference to Shaul Shochat's book on inheritance law was cited for executor duties; court found no such quote.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Fabricated citation to Michael Corinaldi's book on wills was used; court's search yielded no such source/quote.
- Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Fabricated citation to Pinhas Shifman's Family Law treatise supporting neutrality was included; court found no such reference.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Plonit et al. v. The Administrator General in the Tel Aviv District et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Non-existent appellate case was cited to show executor's duty to avoid conflicts; court's database search found no such judgment. Outcome: Monetary Penalty.
- Why does Plonit et al. v. The Administrator General in the Tel Aviv District et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- Verify every doctrinal quote against the physical treatise; AI invents both cases and scholarly passages.
- What does the public record establish about Plonit et al. v. The Administrator General in the Tel Aviv District et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Plonit et al. v. The Administrator General in the Tel Aviv District et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.