HomeCasesN… R… c. M… S…

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

N… R… c. M… S…

Québec SC · Feb 18, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Partial fabrication/manipulation of a quotation attributed to the DPJ; the court reviewed the records and could not find the quoted wording as presented. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Partial fabrication/manipulation of a quotation attributed to the DPJ; the court reviewed the records and could not find the quoted wording as presented. || Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Pure fabrication of a quotation attributed to the children's lawyer (Me Dupont); court could not find the quote in any filed documents. || Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent decision of the Court of Appeal; court could not locate the decision and the defendant later admitted using AI in preparing his materials. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Misstates or invents wording of legislative articles, citing inapplicable provisions or inventing libellés, which misled the court in parts of the motion.
Why it matters now: Pro-se family filer admitted AI use after challenge; non-attorney status kept sanctions to a warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Pro-se family filer admitted AI use after challenge; non-attorney status kept sanctions to a warning.

Record details

CourtQuébec SC

Jurisdictioninternational

Circuit4th Circuit

DateFeb 18, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Partial fabrication/manipulation of a quotation attributed to the DPJ; the court reviewed the records and could not find the quoted wording as presented.
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Pure fabrication of a quotation attributed to the children's lawyer (Me Dupont); court could not find the quote in any filed documents.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent decision of the Court of Appeal; court could not locate the decision and the defendant later admitted using AI in preparing his materials.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Misstates or invents wording of legislative articles, citing inapplicable provisions or inventing libellés, which misled the court in parts of the motion.

Questions this record answers

What happened in N… R… c. M… S…?: False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Partial fabrication/manipulation of a quotation attributed to the DPJ; the court reviewed the records and could not find the quoted wording as presented. Outcome: Warning.
Why does N… R… c. M… S… matter for legal AI risk?: Pro-se family filer admitted AI use after challenge; non-attorney status kept sanctions to a warning.
What does the public record establish about N… R… c. M… S…?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this N… R… c. M… S… summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

S… F… c. I… O…Québec SC · Oct 31, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Susan Elizabeth Duve v. William Charles Forrest, et al.S.D. Texas · Jun 30, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Nady v. Al Sadi, 2026 ONSC 3760Ontario SCJ · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Casey A. Gaddy v. Wood Brothers Bar, Inc., et al.E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Branden Driver v. CNA Financial Corporation et al.E.D. Wisconsin · Jun 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Pro-se family filer admitted AI use after challenge; non-attorney status kept sanctions to a warning.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Partial fabrication/manipulation of a quotation attributed to the DPJ; the court reviewed the records and could not find the quoted wording as presented.

Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Pure fabrication of a quotation attributed to the children's lawyer (Me Dupont); court could not find the quote in any filed documents.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent decision of the Court of Appeal; court could not locate the decision and the defendant later admitted using AI in preparing his materials.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Misstates or invents wording of legislative articles, citing inapplicable provisions or inventing libellés, which misled the court in parts of the motion.

Questions this record answers

What happened in N… R… c. M… S…?

Why does N… R… c. M… S… matter for legal AI risk?

Pro-se family filer admitted AI use after challenge; non-attorney status kept sanctions to a warning.

What does the public record establish about N… R… c. M… S…?

Which source supports this N… R… c. M… S… summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.