HomeCasesRandolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al

D. Minnesotta · May 5, 2026

MN / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found plaintiff's filings contained citations to non-existent cases and suggested generative AI produced fabricated case citations; no specific fabricated citations were identified in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Minnesotta, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Minnesotta, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MinnesotaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Minnesotta

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit8th Circuit

DateMay 5, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found plaintiff's filings contained citations to non-existent cases and suggested generative AI produced fabricated case citations; no specific fabricated citations were identified in the opinion.
False Quotes: Case Law | Court found quotations in the filings that do not appear in the cited cases (false quotes), indicating the plaintiff submitted inaccurate quotes likely generated by AI; no specific misquoted passages were reproduced in the opinion.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court found plaintiff's filings contained citations to non-existent cases and suggested generative AI produced fabricated case citations; no specific fabricated citations were identified in the opinion. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in D. Minnesotta, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Harris v. St. Peter Investors, LLC et al.D. Minnesotta · May 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Leila Kasso v. Police Officers’ Federation of MinneapolisD. Minnesota · Oct 21, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)SWSZ Holding v. SZ GlobalSC Delaware · May 27, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Lagac v. Capital One, N.A.C.D. California · May 22, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Saqib Kafeel v. CJDropshippingN.D. Illinois · May 22, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

MinnesotaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Minnesotta

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit8th Circuit

DateMay 5, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Court found quotations in the filings that do not appear in the cited cases (false quotes), indicating the plaintiff submitted inaccurate quotes likely generated by AI; no specific misquoted passages were reproduced in the opinion.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al?

Why does Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al?

Which source supports this Randolph v. Erick Berscheid Trucking, LLC et al summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.