Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLC
M.D. Florida · May 14, 2026
FL / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Court observed multiple mis-cites and incorrect quotations in Plaintiff's response, noting 'a mis-cite or incorrect quote here and there.' Court flagged these as unsupported or non-existent in the record. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to Show Cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in M.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Court observed multiple mis-cites and incorrect quotations in Plaintiff's response, noting 'a mis-cite or incorrect quote here and there.' Court flagged these as unsupported or non-existent in the record. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in M.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtM.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateMay 14, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court observed multiple mis-cites and incorrect quotations in Plaintiff's response, noting 'a mis-cite or incorrect quote here and there.' Court flagged these as unsupported or non-existent in the record.
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Court found the response 'repeatedly cites to facts and legal theories that do not exist on this record,' i.e., assertions of record facts and legal positions unsupported by exhibits or testimony.
- Misrepresented: Other | Court characterized the response as containing widespread mischaracterizations of fact and law suggesting possible use of AI to generate or alter submissions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLC?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court observed multiple mis-cites and incorrect quotations in Plaintiff's response, noting 'a mis-cite or incorrect quote here and there.' Court flagged these as unsupported or non-existent in the record. Outcome: Order to Show Cause.
- Why does Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to Show Cause in M.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.