Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Sentenza n. 1352/2026
Corte d'Appello Bologna · May 12, 2026
ItalyEditorial impact: highfabricated quotesbar referraltrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Cassazione Civile, Sez. I, n. 28913 del 08/11/2018' with a quoted passage; the Court found the decision was by Sezione Lavoro (date 12/11), concerns a different subject, and the quoted incise is not in the text. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and bar referral involving Unidentified with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Corte d'Appello Bologna, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Cassazione Civile, Sez. I, n. 28913 del 08/11/2018' with a quoted passage; the Court found the decision was by Sezione Lavoro (date 12/11), concerns a different subject, and the quoted incise is not in the text. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fabricated quotes and bar referral involving Unidentified with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Corte d'Appello Bologna, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtCorte d'Appello Bologna
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateMay 12, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Monetary Fine; Bar Referral
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Cassazione Civile, Sez. I, n. 28913 del 08/11/2018' with a quoted passage; the Court found the decision was by Sezione Lavoro (date 12/11), concerns a different subject, and the quoted incise is not in the text.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Cassazione Civile, Sez. II, n. 14041 dell'08/07/2016' with a quoted passage; the Court found the cited decision was actually Sezioni Unite on an unrelated topic and the quoted passage does not appear in that decision.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Sentenza n. 1352/2026?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Cassazione Civile, Sez. I, n. 28913 del 08/11/2018' with a quoted passage; the Court found the decision was by Sezione Lavoro (date 12/11), concerns a different subject, and the quoted incise is not in the text. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral.
- Why does Sentenza n. 1352/2026 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and bar referral involving Unidentified with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral in Corte d'Appello Bologna, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Sentenza n. 1352/2026?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Sentenza n. 1352/2026 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.