Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Cases/Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Corpus matter record
Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STF RE 378.041; court found the phrase absent and no mention of Lei 8.437/92 in that judgment. Outcome: Monetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage. The court imposed a fine of 1 salário-mínimo for bad faith litigation and notified the OAB for potential professional sanctions.
Why the court cared
The record concerns whether quotations and pincites accurately matched the cited source. The tracked outcome is Monetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now
Brazilian courts now auto-notify OAB for fabricated quotes; assume any false citation triggers a disciplinary referral.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STF RE 378.041; court found the phrase absent and no mention of Lei 8.437/92 in that judgment. Outcome: Monetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage. The court imposed a fine of 1 salário-mínimo for bad faith litigation and notified the OAB for potential professional sanctions.
Operational lesson
Brazilian courts now auto-notify OAB for fabricated quotes; assume any false citation triggers a disciplinary referral.
Record details
CourtSão Paulo State Tribunal
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 25, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage
Known amount$1
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STF RE 378.041; court found the phrase absent and no mention of Lei 8.437/92 in that judgment.
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STJ REsp 1.200.000/SP; court found that case is a monocratic decision about justiça gratuita and does not contain the quoted passage; even the suggested RMS 35.905/MG lacks such foundation.
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to ADI 4.296/DF about 'inversão hierárqurica'; court found the ADI addressed Lei 12.016/09 and the quoted passage is not in the ruling.
Questions this record answers
What happened in Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba?
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STF RE 378.041; court found the phrase absent and no mention of Lei 8.437/92 in that judgment. Outcome: Monetary sanction equivalent to one month of minimum wage. The court imposed a fine of 1 salário-mínimo for bad faith litigation and notified the OAB for potential professional sanctions.
Why does Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba matter for legal AI risk?
Brazilian courts now auto-notify OAB for fabricated quotes; assume any false citation triggers a disciplinary referral.
What does the public record establish about Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.