Which source supports this Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesSilva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba

São Paulo State Tribunal · Jul 25, 2025

Brazil Editorial impact: high fabricated quotes administrative trial Monetary Professional

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court sanctioned the lawyer for bad faith litigation by imposing a fine of one minimum wage and ordering a referral to the OAB for professional disciplinary review, following the submission of fabricated legal citations generated via AI.

Why the court cared: The court reasoned that the submission of non-existent precedents constitutes bad faith litigation under Art. 80, V of the CPC, as it misleads the judiciary and hinders the efficient administration of justice. The court cited the STF's Reclamação 78.890 as precedent for treating AI-generated false citations as grounds for both procedural sanctions and disciplinary referrals to the OAB.
Why it matters now: Brazilian courts now auto-notify OAB for fabricated quotes; assume any false citation triggers a disciplinary referral.

Why this matter is tracked

In an interlocutory appeal, the São Paulo State Tribunal sanctioned a lawyer for bad faith litigation after the party submitted fabricated case law citations. The court determined that the lawyer used AI to generate non-existent quotes attributed to the STF and STJ to support a request for reinstatement of a public servant. The court found that the cited precedents either did not contain the quoted passages or were entirely unrelated to the subject matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal due to procedural desertion, imposed a fine of one minimum wage for bad faith litigation under the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code, and ordered the notification of the OAB (Brazilian Bar Association) for potential disciplinary action.

Operational lesson

Brazilian courts now auto-notify OAB for fabricated quotes; assume any false citation triggers a disciplinary referral.

Record details

CourtSão Paulo State Tribunal

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJul 25, 2025

AI toolAI (unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAppeal dismissed; appellant fined one minimum wage for bad faith litigation; OAB notified for disciplinary investigation.

Known amountRecorded in local statutory unit

Professional sanctionReferral to the OAB (Brazilian Bar Association) for potential disciplinary action.

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

explicitly recorded

The court explicitly identified the use of AI in the creation of the petition.

Procedural posture

Interlocutory appeal (Agravo de Instrumento) dismissed by the 6th Public Law Chamber of the São Paulo State Tribunal.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STF RE 378.041; court found the phrase absent and no mention of Lei 8.437/92 in that judgment.
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to STJ REsp 1.200.000/SP; court found that case is a monocratic decision about justiça gratuita and does not contain the quoted passage; even the suggested RMS 35.905/MG lacks such foundation.
False Quotes: Case Law | Quote attributed to ADI 4.296/DF about 'inversão hierárqurica'; court found the ADI addressed Lei 12.016/09 and the quoted passage is not in the ruling.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba?: The court sanctioned the lawyer for bad faith litigation by imposing a fine of one minimum wage and ordering a referral to the OAB for professional disciplinary review, following the submission of fabricated legal citations generated via AI.
Why does Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba matter for legal AI risk?: Brazilian courts now auto-notify OAB for fabricated quotes; assume any false citation triggers a disciplinary referral.
What does the public record establish about Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Silva Cordeiro v. Municipio de Santana do Parnaiba summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Recurso de Suplicación 0005472/2025T.S.X. Galicia · Jul 7, 2026fabricated quotes + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)14095863 Canada Inc v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jul 3, 2026fabricated quotes + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Chilly Moose Ltd. v Moosehead Breweries LimitedTrademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026fabricated quotes + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Moosehead Breweries Limited v 14095863 Canada Inc.Trademarks Opposition Board · Jun 29, 2026fabricated quotes + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)K.W. v. Ringwood Board of EducationD. New Jersey · Jun 16, 2026fabricated quotes + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Seeto v. KendallD. Nevada · May 5, 2026fabricated quotes + administrative · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open São Paulo State Tribunal profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology