Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 95/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc.
D. DC · Oct 3, 2025
DC / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycontract
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited Simpkins for the proposition that courts in this Circuit routinely reject motions based solely on attorney argument; the court found this to be a false proposition of law. Outcome: Costs Order; Order to notify Bar. Show Cause Order is available here.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Costs Order; Order to notify Bar; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Grammar tools are not legal research; ban non-legal AI from any citation workflow and mandate primary-source verification.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited Simpkins for the proposition that courts in this Circuit routinely reject motions based solely on attorney argument; the court found this to be a false proposition of law. Outcome: Costs Order; Order to notify Bar. Show Cause Order is available here.
Operational lesson
Grammar tools are not legal research; ban non-legal AI from any citation workflow and mandate primary-source verification.
Record details
District of ColumbiaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. DC
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitD.C. Circuit
DateOct 3, 2025
GR
AI toolGrammarly; ProWritingAid
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeCosts Order; Order to notify Bar
Known amount$1
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
Grammarly; ProWritingAid is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Costs Order; Order to notify Bar
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
9 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited Simpkins for the proposition that courts in this Circuit routinely reject motions based solely on attorney argument; the court found this to be a false proposition of law.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited De Aguilar v. Boeing Co. as affirming authority to condition extensions on mediation; the court found this to be a false proposition of law.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n quoted United States v. Johnson for the notion that dilatory conduct against settlement efforts weighs against continuances; the court found the quotation fabricated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited United States v. Jorgensen, which the court determined does not exist, and paired it with a fabricated quotation.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited Morris v. Slappy for a rule requiring diligent attempts to resolve conflicts before seeking a continuance; the court found this to be a false proposition of law.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited United States v. Burton for the holding that continuances may be denied if circumstances are foreseeable or self-imposed; the court found this to be a false proposition of law.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n quoted Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp. for the statement that unsworn statements by counsel are not evidence; the court found the quotation fabricated.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n quoted United States v. Poston for a requirement that continuances be supported by a firm basis in the record; the court found the quotation fabricated.
Show 1 additional discrepancies
- False Quotes: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n quoted United States v. Burton for the statement that a scheduling conflict alone is insufficient for a continuance; the court found the quotation fabricated.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc.?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Pl.'s Opp'n cited Simpkins for the proposition that courts in this Circuit routinely reject motions based solely on attorney argument; the court found this to be a false proposition of law. Outcome: Costs Order; Order to notify Bar. Show Cause Order is available here.
- Why does Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- Grammar tools are not legal research; ban non-legal AI from any citation workflow and mandate primary-source verification.
- What does the public record establish about Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Smith v. Athena Construction Group, Inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.